Would we just have to stop ALL research if we had to kill an ANIMAL?
2006-10-28 10:02:23 · 22 answers · asked by HELLBENT 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes.I think that the researchers have to keep locations of rat labs secret today.
Them baby seals might be harboring a miracle cure for liberalism.
2006-10-28 10:08:36 · answer #1 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Scientists do this sort of thing all the time, perhaps not stem cell reasearch from aborted baby seals, but they do perform experiments on animals all the time. They do it both to further our understanding of nature and to help preserve/restore the environment.
As for aborting baby seals, well that is a bit different isn't it? I suppose if pregnant seal were able to CHOOSE to have an abortion, and scientists could use stem cells from the fetus to improve the health of seals all over the world, your analogy would make sense. And yes, liberals WOULD support it.
Your assumption that liberals care more for animals than people is not only hateful and stupid, but false. We can, and do, care for both.
2006-10-28 10:07:41 · answer #2 · answered by Skippy 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Go ahead, don't really care. If it can help someone, go right ahead.
Oh yeah, and seals? Why not just use elephant stem cells, or viper stem cells. OOH, I know, what about whale stem cells, I hear they're pretty plentiful. Human stem cells are the only ones that a human can use, feeb. Get a life.
2006-10-28 10:05:40 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Since that would only cure diseases in seals, it might not attract funding, but might help prevent some threatened species from going extinct.
We have been overlooking a source of undifferentiated cells that would be easily available without using human fetus material. The unused brains of G.W.B and supporters could provide as much as two pounds/each.
2006-10-28 10:06:27 · answer #4 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If it would help save a life you bet I would.
Most embryonic cells are NOT from aborted fetuses.They are grown in the lab.
If one of your loved one was stricken with one of any number of horrible diseases that could be helped by stem cell research.You would quickly change your mind.Just look at Nancy Regan.
2006-10-28 10:18:39 · answer #5 · answered by eva b 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's sad considering embryonic stem cell research has produced 0 results compared to adult stem cell's 72 results.
2006-10-28 10:20:58 · answer #6 · answered by JP 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your question doesn't even make any sense!
But then your a Republican...that explains why!
FYI ...
They do KILL animals for research....
and the people still die anyways...
So whats YOUR POINT or is this
a trick question that only Republicans
can understand?
2006-10-28 13:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Baby Seals are a renewable resource when managed properly. Lets make sure we protect them.
2006-10-28 10:09:12 · answer #8 · answered by drlykron 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberals would not let us get stem cells from baby seals. (That would be against Animal Rights.)
We must kill human babies to get them. (Human babies have no rights.)
Good point.
2006-10-28 10:18:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The thing is scientists have discovered that they can use the umbilical cord to extract stem cells so why mess with human or any other embryo!
Why can't the liberals just see the truth,
killing babies born or unborn is a horrendous murder!
2006-10-28 10:08:32 · answer #10 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋