28 days later vs .dawn of the dead?

Question

yeah which movie do u guyz like better or think is scarier? also is thier a sequel to either?

Answer 1

I thinj that 28 days later is better.Not necesarily scarrier,but better.I think that in"Dawn ..of there is too much action.

Answer 2

OMG i cant belive alot of you guys are all into the 28 days movie im sorry that movie just sucked it was a long over drawn borning movie and i wish i could have fast foward through till the ending and save my time with all that mindless garbage they had in it.. I will say that it was a good mind F@#K movie and just what happend if you were the last people alive but in my honest opinion i would say the first and the remake of dawn of the dead was a way better movie then 28 days later and yes thier is a part two comming out for this movie and i hope it does a better job then the first one did and any george a romero zombie flick will beat 28 days later im sorry.

Answer 3

The remake of Dawn of the Dead is the champ, in this face-off [and, to tell you the truth, Romero's "Dawn" is better and scarier than "28 Days"]. "28" is no more than a Plague movie with a Cockney accent. It is NOT a Zombie movie.

"28" peters out midway through its duration, with a stock "us vs. military brutes" scenario and a cop-out ending. Snyder's "Dawn" delivers the goods from start to finish while still managing to have a depth and texture "28" can only wish it had.

Acting, screen-play, editing, soundtrack, camera work...hands down, it's "Dawn" which, by the way, probably single-handedly jump-started the Zombie re-birth and jet-propelled Max Brooks to do his "WWZ"

Shoot, the first ten minutes alone would be enough to elevate Snyder's "Dawn" over "28," in the scare category. It's a very well-done movie, not just a horror or SF film [by the way, as with Romero's "Dawn" the apocalyptic, (and, admittedly flimsily quasi-scientific) aspect of the movie does make this a superior SF film, as well as a zombie/horror flick].

Answer 4

28 days later is way better than either Dawn of the Dead or Land of the Dead the sequel.
Shaun of the Dead is a hillarious poke at Dawn of the Dead.

Answer 5

28 Days Later, more action... the sequel will be 28 Weeks Later and be placed in America

Answer 6

one question, are you referring to the original Dawn of the Dead or the remake?
being an avid zombie horror movie fan, i would go with the original Dawn of the Dead, even though now it doesnt really look as scarey as it did when i was younger.....

however, 28 days later was an awesome movie and i think it was a little more realistic

Answer 7

28 Days Later is MUCH better.
I believe there's a sequel in the works.

Answer 8

28 days later.....dawn of the dead was good but 28 days later beats it...more realistic and creepier

Answer 9

Ya can't beat the classics! Go with Dawn of the Dead(original one).

Answer 10

28 days later is better....i dont think there's a sequel though.