English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Society gives benefits to marriage because marriage gives benefits to society. Therefore, the burden of proof must rest upon the advocates of homosexual unions to demonstrate that such unions benefit society (not just the individuals involved) in the same way and to the same degree as marriage between a man and a woman.


Because homosexual unions never result in natural procreation and never provide children with both a mother and a father, this is a burden they simply cannot meet.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20061027/cm_usatoday/wheresjudicialrestraint


What societal benefits does HETEROSEXUAL ONLY marriage serve when less than half the US population is married?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/us/15census.html?ex=1318564800&en=e788ed47b459cd7f&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
What does having the ability to produce children have to do with the validity of marriage?
And does that mean that childless heterosexual couples are not entitled to a valid marriage?
WHY

2006-10-28 09:18:55 · 1 answers · asked by rwl_is_taken 5 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN THIS????????

2006-10-29 16:53:28 · update #1

3 days and 1 answer--thanx

2006-10-31 16:37:16 · update #2

1 answers

Thank you for pointing out the ridiculous hypocrisy of those who oppose gay marriage--hopefully sooner or later it will start to get through to those who oppose it that their reasons are not valid and they are making themselves look ignorant

2006-10-29 17:04:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers