Society gives benefits to marriage because marriage gives benefits to society. Therefore, the burden of proof must rest upon the advocates of homosexual unions to demonstrate that such unions benefit society (not just the individuals involved) in the same way and to the same degree as marriage between a man and a woman.
Because homosexual unions never result in natural procreation and never provide children with both a mother and a father, this is a burden they simply cannot meet.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20061027/cm_usatoday/wheresjudicialrestraint
What societal benefits does HETEROSEXUAL ONLY marriage serve when less than half the US population is married?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/us/15census.html?ex=1318564800&en=e788ed47b459cd7f&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
What does having the ability to produce children have to do with the validity of marriage?
And does that mean that childless heterosexual couples are not entitled to a valid marriage?
WHY
2006-10-28
09:18:55
·
1 answers
·
asked by
rwl_is_taken
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN THIS????????
2006-10-29
16:53:28 ·
update #1
3 days and 1 answer--thanx
2006-10-31
16:37:16 ·
update #2