The most loud and vocal morons that gotta make sure everyone knows how much they hate "f@gs" are the same ones who will cheer and hoot and hollar at two drunk chicks making out at a party or whatever. How can you be that big of a jack@ss, if you can't even be bothered to feel consistently across the board? That means, if you're gonna overrun your mouth abut "f@gs", you gotta be against those hot "bi" chicks, too.
Or is it only "wrong" if it doesn't give these f**ktards a "pup-tent"? I realize there are women who are the opposite, against lesbians, but women are not generally loud or violent, like males. It's not the same thing.
Would showing signs of a brain hurt these types machismo somehow? How can these types be this f**king stupid?
2006-10-28
06:59:43
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Brad B
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Yeah, Paladin, you are a f*cktard. but even as a 10000% straight male that likes lesbians, you have to realize how stupid going overboard about fags makes you sound. You have no cred from an intelligent standpoint, if you're not going to attack all of it. ie: shut up about it, or attack all of it. Period.
2006-10-28
07:07:01 ·
update #1
There is no difference between male and female bisexuality except that one turns you on and the other doesn't. if it's a "perversion" from guys, it's the same for women. In other words, you are a moron. Paladin, you must be 15, so I'll ignore you from here on.
2006-10-28
07:15:13 ·
update #2
Yes, and if you support that "perversion" just because of something like personal preference and thinking with your dick, you cannot honestly expect to be taken seriously, rambling on about how wrong fags are.
2006-10-28
07:21:45 ·
update #3
|"Real men"? lol. You recognize that many are soldiers, bikers, athletes, and NOT Queer Eye material, don't you? And that a |"fag" almost took the world over? What is a "real man"? Self-important crap. It's not just "homos" that won't take you seriously. It's anyone with half a braincell. Hell, I even respect |Fred Phelps more than you. At least he has convictions. You support "faggotry" when it turns you on (women). NOONE with intelligence will take you serious. Only other moronssuch as yourself.
That macho **** isn't what being a "real man" is all about. Do you beat your wife and dog, too? A "real man" does.
2006-10-28
07:36:19 ·
update #4
Fate didn't deal me ****. I got a brain, which is a better deal than you. I used to say the same type of **** when I was 10 or 11. Once I started getting into lesbians, (I didn't think gay thoughts for a long time), I just stopped picking on gay guys, because I was conscious of how hypocritical I would sound. If I were 100% straight, I would still say it's not my business. Especially if I liked lesbians. A |LOT of straight guys think that way: your business, not mine. If all straight guys thought as retarded as you, paladin, we would be sorry. Forget about schools. It would be a waste of time.
2006-10-28
09:11:26 ·
update #5
One more thing. First off, I don't wanna hear the "personal preference excuse" any longer. You know..."Easy. Two homos disgust men to the point of nausea, and two babes are a turn on. Case closed."
That is retarded. Personal preference is a lighthearted subject. After all, you might not like to see ugly people making out, but you don't blow it out of proportion and make this huge deal about them being wrong. Once you start going overboard and getting loud and/or vocal about how it's "wrong" or a "sick perversion" that they are trying to force on you...Once you do that, you have left the arena of a this being a simple issue of personal preference.
At that point, you're turning it into a discussion that requires thought and backing up your statements. At that point, holding double standards hurts your side of the arguement.
2006-10-29
01:19:08 ·
update #6
People who are so obsessed with things sexual that they are moved to hatred because of other people's choices tend to be more animal than human already, in my opinion. Stop focussing on it yourself, and don't expect higher brain function from people who are more ruled by mating instinct than they are by reason.
2006-10-28 07:11:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by functionary01 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it's just more pleasing to watch hot chicks go at it and it's hard to watch ugly chicks or two guys. That doesn't mean it's right but that's the way it is. I wish people would get over hating gay people, but that may take another 50 or so years, but it will happen eventually.
That being said, ever notice when they talk about gay marriage on TV they always show pictures of two guys or they get the ugliest lesbians they can find? If they would only show hot lesbians on the news when talking about gay marriage maybe it would help the cause.
2006-10-28 07:23:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Reject187 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Easy. Two homos disgust men to the point of nausea, and two babes are a turn on. Case closed.
There is a big difference between men and women. Ask your mother about it.
No, I don't think I am whatever you imagine a "f**ktard" to be. But I am quite certain of the class of person you are and that you are obviously self-loathing and desperate for acceptance of your sick perversion. Sorry, but none here.
And no, I don't have to attack all or none. That's your pathetic rule and nobody else's.
It is good that you ignore me, since you have no chance to win this argument. I didn't say lesbianism was not a perversion. I just said that it is simply infinitely more acceptable to men than two polesmokers like you.
I don't expect to be "taken seriouly" by homos, simply because their argument is steeped in self-interest. But real men know what I'm talking about, and this is a fact of life that will never ever change, much to your dismay.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. Sorry fate dealt you such a sh1tty hand. I don't say that it is fair, but it is reality.
And judging by the mentality you display, were you born a straight man, you would be exactly the kind of person you purport to despise in your post.
2006-10-28 07:02:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paladin 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The key to your question is after they drink beer, I do not like watching women in public making out or guys for that matter, some people do gay things like let a guy have oral sex with him and nothing in return, so they think they are straight, but no they are gay and I would say these people are the gay haters, because they do not want to be found out
2006-10-28 07:09:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by man of ape 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You show me a homophobes, I'll show you a closet case.
In answer to your question though, who said homophobes had to be rational or unbiased? If you are str8, two guys are not going to do much for you, two girls will probably give you a smile.
In fairness, though, I know plenty of gay guys who are not the most tolerant of other folks too.
There are a LOT more bi-guys around than will ever have the courage to admit it, often they are ashamed of their own feelings - and verbally / physically lash out at others who are more balanced about themselves.
VERY few homophobes beat up self-hating gay men, they nearly always lash out at the one who seem to be getting on with their lives.
Look around at homophobes you know, how many are well adjusted, happily attached folks with a reasonable job and lifestyle? ANY of them?!?
2006-10-28 07:20:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone is welcome to do what they want with who they want...I just don't want to watch any of it. Watching others snog, regardless of gender or sexuality, doesn't do it for me. I wanna be the one getting kissed!
As for your pointing out the double standard? You are VERY right. If you're gonna say one is right the other ipso facto is also correct. and if one is wrong then the other should be too.
2006-10-28 07:35:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Watching a couple of drunk chicks go at it is a turn on. What's your problem?
2006-10-28 07:05:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋