English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

NOPE. never heard of it. Simply because being GAY is PURE example of lust (abnormal lust that is) and nothing else. Love is not even in the picture of gay marriages. The reason why i strongly appose this is because 1 gay will hurt 2 innocents and turn them to gays. 2 gays will hurt 4 innocents and continue so on. Please come back to the light. You know you are wrong and stop that devilish act. Smack that head of yours with some thoughts and wake up!!

Well just practicing freedom of speech so i hope nobody gets hurt.

Now what do you think of that?

Anybody here supports me?

2006-10-28 06:31:12 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

To Spyder

The reason for me to quoted GAY rather then lesbianism is YES im refering to man.
Man lead the whole army not women. Man is the head of the train. Man is the primary figure. Yes man is the one who guide women. Man distroy this earth not women. Man destroy women not visi-versa. And in nno time in my life would i let any man touch my A.s.s! I'll kick his butt if he do that. DISGUSTING!

2006-10-28 09:11:30 · update #1

17 answers

I strongly support you. It is not morally OK to practise homosexuality or lesbianism. Apart from the hurting souls, it is a sin against God Almighty. Lev 18:22

2006-10-28 06:40:50 · answer #1 · answered by saintbeng 2 · 3 5

I'll be the first to agree with free speech, but I'm also gonna say that I also believe in " a time and a place for everything". This is the glbt section, therefore NOT the place to bash gays. Just like you wouldn't declare how much you hate america at the Capitol building. This behavior would probably get you hurt by some very irritated people. Free speech is great, trust me, I'd be the first to bring out a bullhorn and stage a protest on all KINDS of things, but you need to bring your observations and opinions to a nuetral playing field, so my friend..this is not it. Take your ramblings to a neutral crowd, here, this is too biased and you're just playing on deaf ears.

Also, no one can be "turned" as you claim unless they want to be "turned". Like the saying goes "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink". ANNNNND furthermore, for all you religious people making accusations that gays are basically spawns of Satan and "hurting people's souls" as you claim...wow, how quickly you place the blame on everyone but yourselves. Like I just said, we can't "turn" anyone unless they WANT to be "turned"....just like in your "bible"..so who's fault was it that sin was introduced into the world? If you believe on blaming everyone else, you blame the devil? Hey, Eve didn't HAVE to eat that apple if she didn't WANT to.

2006-10-28 07:14:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. Been there, done that.
2. No, you have absolutely no way of disproving anyone's emotions and emotional commitment to another. To even attempt to do so promotes nothing but lies and bigotry.
3. Homosexuals do not "turn" others. You are doing nothing more than promoting discriminatory propaganda as fact.
4. Freedom of speech, such as it is, actually does NOT cover slander and libel and many other such types of speech. BTW, just for your information, freedom of speech is also considered to not be an issue when you sign the agreement agreeing to abide by Community Guidelines such as the ones here in Yahoo Answers.

5. I "think" you are misguided in the extreme. Little grandstanding displays do more to show exactly how hateful Bigots and those who support bigotry are in this country than it does to draw others to your cause. Keep going, it makes the work of those who are publicly and openly fighting for our rights much, much easier.

2006-10-28 06:54:18 · answer #3 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1 1

George Michael and Elton John amongst others. I don't think you should get negative votes for what you say. This forum should be free to say what you want.

It seems minorities seem to get angry and a knee jerk reaction is to down vote somebody. Maybe a different approach to your situation might reap better responses in the future.

I support free speech. Straight folk hurt countless numbers of people also. i can see why folk regard same sex relations as immoral, however It is only the camp gays that try and force their views upon the rest of the world that I don't like.

So its not gay you don't like I think its just people trying to force you into a set way of thinking.

2006-10-28 07:34:39 · answer #4 · answered by SunGod 4 · 0 1

As you are definately entitled to your freedom of speech, there are going to be plenty of people not upset by your question, but irritated by you and all the others like you, as usual; and you know it. Apparently; you have nothing better to do than to focus on others being happy in THEIR life (which you are no part of); and continue to bash and cut them down. It's not your life, you aren't a part of it. If youre straight, good for you - let people be as they are and focus on the screwed up life that you might have in front of you...

2006-10-28 06:36:08 · answer #5 · answered by llsoinlovell 2 · 0 0

You oppose homosexuality because no man has ever sung you a love song?? Give me a break. Maybe you'd better adjust your criteria to reality. I'm a gay married man in a 20 year monogamous relationship...it isn't lust that keeps you after that long....how come you, yourself know so much about homosexuality?

2006-10-28 07:18:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, I don't support you. I think you're entitled to your free speech, but, you're just being hateful. Which, I don't understand.

Maybe all the homosexuals in the world are just fanatical religious people...
"Love thy neighbor"... ha-ha. Just kidding.

But, no, I don't agree, and I don't' understand your math of 2 homosexuals hurting 4 people... how? If the two people are in a relationship, together, how are other people involved?

You just seem rather bigoted and small minded.

2006-10-28 06:36:42 · answer #7 · answered by Sylvie M 3 · 1 1

Just to name a few....Elton John, George Michael, Boy George, Lance Bass, Cole Porter, George Maharis, Melissa Etheridge.

I added Melissa even though you asked for guys because of my following statement. You are homosexual! I know this because all of your 'questions' and hatred seems to be directed towards gay men not homosexuals. You just can't deal with your sexual orientation because of your religious beliefs.

2006-10-28 08:25:21 · answer #8 · answered by Spyder 5 · 0 0

you are a mean, cruel and evil person. what gives u the right to judge people to such a violent extent?! either u need to go to church more often or stop going all together coz somewhere along the line ur being horribly influenced!

2006-10-28 07:19:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sure, there have been plenty of songs. They're just not always that obvious in the lyrics.

If you want something with lyrics that are obviously about manXman love, well then, here's one example...

'Man Gegen Man' by Rammstein

2006-10-28 06:42:24 · answer #10 · answered by MigukInUJB 3 · 1 1

Of course I have. Elton John was writing songs to the man or men that he loved, all those years ago since the 1970's. People just weren't aware of that. Some of what we consider the most beautiful and classic love songs of pop were written by a man to a man.

2006-10-28 06:35:11 · answer #11 · answered by Oghma Gem 6 · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers