English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

Obama can actually speak, and not fumble all over his words! It's like watching a train wreck whenever Bush speaks.

2006-10-28 04:49:18 · answer #1 · answered by irish_mick_25 3 · 2 4

Barack Obama

2006-10-28 11:40:56 · answer #2 · answered by leena 4 · 2 5

If I wanted to hear someone intelligently discuss the issues, I'd watch Obama.

On the other hand, if I needed a good laugh and wanted to hear someone butcher the English language with mispronounced words, garbled syntax and be about as evasive as a person can be when it comes to answering questions, I'd watch the Village Idiot, Bush.

2006-10-28 13:15:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

George Bush, who cares what Barack has to say. The President is far more important, whether you like him or not

2006-10-28 11:40:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

Bush. Barack Obama is just a media darling, no substance. The Dems won't let him inter fer with Hillary's run for the Presidency so they will find a way to marginalize him when the time is right.

2006-10-28 11:44:18 · answer #5 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 3 3

Bush

2006-10-28 11:41:22 · answer #6 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 4 3

This person asked who would you rather watch on TV. Not who was more important. I would rather watch someone who can give an interview or a speech without looking like a dumb *** hick. I would rather watch Barack Obama.

2006-10-28 11:49:13 · answer #7 · answered by SAGAL79 4 · 1 4

In truth, Obama speeches and interviews are filled with so much more substance about actual issues, like him or not, than Bush's, which tend to deflect questions or simplify answers to very black-and-white issues. (Note this says nothing directly about their policy)

2006-10-28 11:55:15 · answer #8 · answered by topher8128 2 · 1 2

I was impressed by Obama on Oprah this week. He looks like a good man but I have no idea what he wants for our country, what his view points are and such. I would need to listen to his campaign platform first. I listen to Pres. Bush when he addressed the nation. He is a more 'normal' man with his language and presentation. I like that because men like Clinton and Kerry seem more for show and their words are empty. I would rather listen to a man in jeans and t-shirt talking in laymen's terms about future plans for our country rather than a man in an expensive suit using 'big' words that many Americans don't understand talking about "we have a plan". Tell me the plan already! I want to fully understand what he is saying instead of having the media interpret his words. Besides, the media is bias in so many ways.

Obama looks like a good guy but I have no idea what he stays for. I am interested in hearing from him some more but I will not vote for him just because he looks and sounds intelligent. I have to agree with him to vote for him.

2006-10-28 11:48:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

I rather watch someone that can complete a thought in a meaningful manner.
But, the point about who cares what he says is correct. George is the pres. even if he can't complete a sentence that makes any sense..

2006-10-28 11:45:00 · answer #10 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers