Is this government intrusion? Affirmative action? or Violation of free speech? Or, a good thing?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/27/AR2006102701104.html
2006-10-28 02:22:22 · 8 answers · asked by Snowshoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't believe it is a good thing.the attempted indoctrination of our children by left wing teachers starts very young.you cant force conservatives to become teachers,or schools to hire people based on a political litmus tests.fact is those who can do,those who cant teach.this is why so many liberals are teachers.its your responsibility to enlighten your children about the complete and utter hypocrisy that is liberal thinking.to be a liberal and champion leftist views, your either stupid or your a liar.let them decide what they want to be.arm them with the facts.thats all you can do.
2006-10-28 02:41:44 · answer #1 · answered by not gonna show 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All of the above. Okay, the "good thing" that I agree with is that colleges would hire the conservative profs., not that they would be forced to do so. That would be a bad thing. But I think it would be nice if the colleges would take the initiative, themselves, to provide a moderately balanced administrative staff in order to give students a well-rounded education, not the indoctrination that seems to take place on some campuses.
2006-10-28 02:27:48 · answer #2 · answered by BigRichGuy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i became born this way. Now having pronounced this, being a nurse, i comprehend that the gay people I even have talked to approximately this do no longer come to a decision to "turn gay" . We, as a society have come a protracted way, by accepting gay existence. while i began out in nursing gay habit became seen a neurosis and a habit deviation decrease than the psychological Society prognosis. This decision isn't the habit that keeps a civilization. i do no longer think of that individuals could be saved from people they love. i do no longer think of they could be denied some large advantages of the companion. I do exactly no longer see why the call for of the terminology of Marriage! Why kidnap the term while it quite is been appropriate to a male and a woman?
2016-10-16 12:03:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, logically, shouldn't there be a balance? If a school only has liberal professors, and they're the kind that think it's necessary to constantly harp about their opinions in class, they're not teaching students: They are indoctrinating them.
It's simply not right to have something like that be one-sided.
More conservatives and moderates need to get into teaching.
2006-10-28 02:26:56 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good thing. College students should be exposed to all sides of the political spectrum so that they can learn to make informed logical decisions. Indoctrination is not what colleges are there for. They are seats of higher learning; let the students learn from each side.
2006-10-28 02:27:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What is the difference between affirmative action and this? Nothing, so either neither should be illegal, or both should
As a college student, i am sick of some of my professors ranting on sometimes about their view point.
2006-10-28 02:26:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Isn't it the same as the liberals re-introducing the equal time act if they win the Congress? I think it is.
I think it is a good thing. Parents are paying good money to have their kids educated not indoctrinated.
2006-10-28 02:25:58 · answer #7 · answered by noobienoob2000 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
OMG!!! No more Ward Churchills!!
2006-10-28 02:28:05 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋