Every political party has "extremist". You know they are just a minority. During WW2 we should have focused on isolating the extremist, and not attacking the entire party.
We should have been more understanding and sensitive. And stopped anykind of "broad generalizations".
What do you think? I'm a pretty smart guy, huh!
2006-10-28 01:10:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Is it fair to convict the ones who aid & abet murder along with the one who pulls the trigger?
Or is it "politically expedient" to white wash their crimes, and "forget" their part in bringing about the homicides of millions of humans...men, women and children?
Why should we be more understanding of those who either helped or looked on in silence?
n yup! Pretty smart...It's a fair Q...any political +/or religious party has extremists...but the party will take moves to disown both the extremism and the extremists; if the party gives tacit approval by remaining silent or jumping on the band-wagon that ushers the extremists into power...then yes, the party is as guilty of the insanity that follows as the ones they allow to lead them into it.
2006-10-28 01:50:31 · answer #1 · answered by cheek peas 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really smart. One should blame the whole party. The whole party wanted to listen and carry out the orders of the "extremist".
Now, the word "Nazi" is dubbed as being evil from the WW2 Nazi. Knowing this (now in the future) Anyone who deems themselves as a "Nazi" is ridiculous and has no right to claim innocence.
2006-10-28 01:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by mymack79 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think you can blame every member of the Nazi party for the actions of their extremest leaders. Look at the U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq, not all of them are there because they believe it's the best policy, but because they are Americans and they swore an oath to the military and their country. The ultimate decision to invade Iraq was made by president Bush and his advisers. The members of the Nazi party were under the command of Adolf Hitler and his advisers. If a troop of boy scouts go camping in a wooded area, and their adult supervisor directs them to build a campfire, which gets out of control and becomes a forest fire, do you blame the boy scouts or their leader, who is the adviser? If a factory or business shuts down because it's not making enough money to survive, do you blame the workers, no, the blame falls on the plant supervisor and his advisers.
2006-10-28 01:31:50 · answer #3 · answered by one eye 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES!!! This refers to 'blame the entire...party' NOT 'I'm smart'. You'r not.
Look at Germany BEFORE the war. Events like 'Crystal Night" shows that the stench pervaded the whole party. Anti semitism, racism, ideas of world domination and a new world order permiated the whole party and even beyond.
Understanding? Sensitive? Over 6 million Jews had plenty of this, didn't they! Ask some who survived. They will tell you how U & S the Nastys (Nazis) were ALL of them.
2006-10-28 01:15:47 · answer #4 · answered by jemhasb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. But when some muslims conduct act of terrorism, the religion of islam is blamed for that. Similarly Nazi Party is blamed for the actions of few. I think it should not be.
2006-10-28 02:02:34 · answer #5 · answered by jikg 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋