1.ONE THING CAN NEVER REPRESENT ANOTHER THING IF THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE IN THEM.
2. THE EQUIVALENCES OF THOSE YOU REPRESENT MUST BE IN WHAT YOU ARE.
2006-10-27 22:15:53 · 8 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
No to the first one: Supposing I was a back up quarterback but had less talent than the guy I'm replacing. Then he is at least my equivalent. He is my equivalent and then some. If I'm better than him the same applies in reverse. So there has to be equivalence to represent. I can't disprove it.
----------------------
Yes to the second one: I'll use the same analogy. If I'm a lesser player than the guy I'm replacing then I am not his equivalent. So his equivalent is not in me.
2006-10-27 22:38:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm laughing so hard at Paul's answer. Really funny!!
Anyways... It is possible to disprove both the statements pretty easily.
1- A rose can represent a kiss (Old hindi movies)... there is no equivalence in them.
2- There is no clear definition of "what-I-am" and it is pretty arbitrary. For a goat, a rose is a food item and for me it is a beautiful flower.
2006-10-27 22:25:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is possible to disprove the following points: 1. Link: If on a webpage, the number 1 or the text "unity" is written, and is not a link(hyperlink), it is still unity. 2. Unity can not have INFLUENCE on MULTIPLICATION and DIVISION. 5/1=5. 3. Unity can not have SENSATION, also. See above point. 4. When something is NOT origin(0,0), it CAN assume the value 5.Something NOT DERIVATIVE is INTEGRAL. INTEGRAL of 0 can be constant and can assume the value 1. 6. God is one is not a RULE (hindu tradition). 7.the statement if(x == 5) is a CONDITION but no unity. 8.Yes intent can come without unity, several people can have different intents.
2016-05-22 02:41:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is possible.
to make it really simple we could make a heart represent a blanket. and say, when you see a heart we are talking about a blanket. the heart represents the blanket and their is no equivalence.
if you are talking about representation such as a christian representing christ, then an equivalence is not necessary to speak his truths and teach about him, but if your life is supposed to be the representation, then an equivalence is necessary.
2006-10-28 00:42:41 · answer #4 · answered by Tom O 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if they made any sense to begin with.
2006-10-27 22:18:45 · answer #5 · answered by Paul S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is.
2006-10-27 22:28:26 · answer #6 · answered by polyglot_1234 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too deep for me
Th
2006-10-27 23:25:32 · answer #7 · answered by Thermo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-10-27 22:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by meethecapricorn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋