THE EQUIVALENCES OF THOSE YOU REPRESENT MUST BE IN WHAT YOU ARE. Is this a valid statement?

0 ⤊

THE EQUIVALENCES OF THOSE YOU REPRESENT MUST BE IN WHAT YOU ARE. Is this a valid statement?

1.ONE THING CAN NEVER REPRESENT ANOTHER THING IF THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE IN THEM.

2. THE EQUIVALENCES OF THOSE YOU REPRESENT MUST BE IN WHAT YOU ARE.

1 & 2 rephrased version of the questions I posted here previouly. The purpose of rephrasing is not to irritate anyone, but to elimate the errors in the statement.

2006-10-27 21:32:58 · 2 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy

2 answers

Yes and no.Everything is relative.The complexities of the human mind allows people to represent without actually being of equal nature.You can represent a community ,due to you being part of it, but it is not necessary for the equivalences to be present.

2006-10-27 22:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by ace 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Try again. Hint: Mimicry is a form of representation.

2006-10-27 21:46:15 · answer #2 · answered by Grist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋