Would racists accept this reasoning?

Question

I can understand if someone is racist (and, let's face facts, they aren't going to start changing their minds any time soon), but I have a question for anyone reading this who would sooner KILL a person of a "lower" race before asking him for a favor. Why do a great deal of racists find the necessity to murder other races? Consider this for a moment. (I am not racist, but I KNOW how much of a racist prick this is probably going to make me sound, but I'm approaching the issue from THEIR point of view.) Assume that you and whatever race you belong to managed to successfully purge the entire world of the lower, unclean races, creeds, and ethnicities. Everyone is dead except for YOUR race. How, I pose to you, do you know how wonderful your race is without the contrast of these other "lower" races? Picture an America with no blacks or Jews. I would think the KKK would eventually get tired with yelling "white power" if there was no one around for white power to be enforced upon.

Instead of killing off lower races, why not let them live on so you can reflect about how awesome the Master Race (whatever it is) really is? :)

Again, NOT a racist. Just trying to think along their lines so we can all get along. *lol*

Answer 1

That is so true!! Great reasoning. i love the way you think. You have a very vivid imagination.

Answer 2

Unfortunately, I doubt this would be a convincing argument towards them. You have to realize that often these "inferior" groups are viewed by them as somewhat of a disease. Look at the researchers who are trying to find cures for actual diseases. If somehow there was no disease or illness left in the world, yes, I can imagine they may lose some sense of purpose, but they'd have more time for their personal lives and they'd finally get to do everything they couldn't before because they were so busy with their work. Different hate groups have different visions of what they expect from the future, but they're similar in that whatever it is, they won't have to waste time and resources dealing with their undesireables.

From what I've seen personally, the only really convincing argument is when someone previously viewed to be worthless has the chance to do something to prove how he or she can really contribute to society. It's a slow process because it rarely affects more than one person at a time. Of course, the best way is to show how much everyone contributes before stereotypes become set into someone's mind.

Answer 3

If you annihilate at least 6 billion 900 million earthlings and end up with 100 million whites, the blondes with blue eyes will be the new ******* unless 99 percent of the remaining whites are willing to be ******* to that one percent after having worked so hard.

p.s. I don't know if you know this, but,
there are more true blonds in a lot of latin countries than there are in the u.s.
Well, thats when all the hair dye is taken off.
In the 1960's only 4 % of white u.s.a. women were naturally blond. Now its less than 2%. The rest are dyed.

Even Swedes are interesting. The swedes are the only people on earth with dominant alleles for blondish hair in their genotype.
Even here this is almost always tied to swarthy-skinned swedes thought to have asiatic blood from viking-lapp ancestors.

Answer 4

Don't waste your breath. .
The KKK, Skin Heads, Nazis, those are REAL racists.
I am a white blonde with blue eyes. And I tell you now, those people scare the crap out of me. I honestly can't imagine being so full of hatred for another person.
One thing I don't understand about the KKK is if they believe they are so right, why do they hide their faces? Aren't they proud of themselves?
To your question, I think no. They want nothing to do with reasoning. . They hate themselves. That hate has to be directed somewhere. If the Blacks were gone, they'd find another target.
I wish people would stop throwing the word racist around so easily. Those sick b*s#@*ds mentioned above are racists.
Not the cop who pulled a Black man over not for speeding, but "because he was Black".

Answer 5

I am a racist and proud, so I will be pleased to answer. Firstly, few racialists favor "killing" anyone simply beacuse they are a member of another race. That is a Hollywood and MTV lie and myth
In fact the vast majority of victims of racial killing have been Whites. Tamerlane nearly exterminated the White presence in Central Asia, and almost destroyed Aryan Iran. It is estimated that his deprivations took some 25 million lives. Than we must remember the scores of millions of Whites killed by the Mongol invasions of Europe and the Middle East
Further, during the Islamic invasions countlesss millions of Whites were killed and enslaved, though in many instances Islamicized Whites themselves carried out the invasions
Consequently the premiase that White racialists are mass murders is false. On the contrary, we have been the victims far more often
To adress the question directly, White racialists seek to insure the survival of their own people, not exterminate others. To be perfectly candid most of us do believe that to do this in the longterm we need our own homelands, but this does not mean we have any designs on the homelands of Non-Whites. All we awnt is for the physica;l and spiritual; beauty and identity of our people not to disappear. No demographer disputes that this is eventually exactly what will happen to Whites, especially in North America and Western Europe, if present trens in birthrates, immigration and racial mixture continue.
REAL diversity will not be served by merging the wporlds races into a brown mass. None of this has any bearing on who is "inferior" or "superior" . Certainly, people, includiong WNs have their opinions, but this is not the basis of racialism. Its inherently impossible for it to be so. In fact if the question is "superiority, one should than shun the :inferior " Whites as well , and one could than have no objection to mixing with the intelligent Non-Whites
Instead its about UNIQUENESS and IDENTITY

Learn more here!

http://www.panf.info

Answer 6

If all 'lower forms' of humans were actually exterminated, man's tendency to create and maintain social strata based on status and power structures would not die with them.

The 'master' race that survives would begin sifting among themselves in order to ferret out the 'imperfect within the perfect,' on their attempted path to ultimate perfection, which, of course, is only possible in an individual human mind.

This is why it's a fallacy to equate the measure of human value with any particular creed, ethnicity or cultural group.

What's in one man is in every man, for better or worse.

Ultimately, only individual accountability, rather than mob mentality, will maintain and reinforce the world's collective homeostasis.

Answer 7

i see what your point is but its stupid,i see how you thought it was deep though.i liked it better when they did the same thing on the old star trek where the two alien guys are each painted white and black but one guy has it white on the right side and black on the left vice versa for the other guy,or dr.suess's star belly sneeds,"they have stars on thars"...i mean cmon your part of the human race,its not just racist or biased in the u.s its global,so if in fact your little scenario happened of course all the white people would nit pick each other to some other form of group a superiority.you know that,thi s is a dumb question

Answer 8

They would just go on to nitpick the remaining "superior" race until they've cleansed it of some other unsavory thing and repeat as needed. Humans weren't designed to be content with their surroundings--it's in our nature to always find something to fault, something to be dissatisfied with. Look back over the centuries--when has the world ever been at peace?

Answer 9

It sounds like you are talking about racist economics; supply and demand. Interesting point. What I think would happen is that after killing the inferior races, then the whites will start targeting each other. The almost white haired blonds will start burning the dirty blonds; and the dirty blonds will be attacking the brown haired crackers.....

Humans will always find a difference amongst them.

Answer 10

lol! this is funny cause all this answers in one way or another suggest that the caucasian race is superior to the other ones?!!! hello! the egyptians, the mayans, ? they were performing brain surgery on people and had had so much knowledge about the skies and sciences while The Nordics ( Real Anglos) were running around in caves as primitive tribes! Do more research people

Answer 11

You're right. It would be boring if we were the same race. If you take it to the extreme, if all men and women were identical to each other, it would REALLY be boring.
Same thing with "morality". You couldn't know "good" without "evil".
Or emotion: You couldn't know "joy" without "sorrow".

Now me, I'm not racist because I hate everybody EQUALLY!