Also, how many trillions of dollars of deficit has he spent?.. I just tried to look it up and I could only guess at 3 trillion, but I think it's a lot higher... I'm posting this in elections, because everyone knows the republicans vote in lock step with each other, and if you vote for a republican senator or congressman, your voting for a bush.
2006-10-27 19:54:54 · 13 answers · asked by david n 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
(1) Increasing the value of Halliburton stock
(2) Destroying the environment and wetlands
(3) Employed drilling and mining in national parks
(4) Taking away virtually all work safety regulation
(5) Packed regulatory agencies with industry buddies
(6) Killing many thousands of innocent people
(7) Destroying long standing relationships with friendly countries
(8) Undermined and ignored international law
(9) Sabotaged all forms of constitutional protection
(10) Turned the U.S. into a fascist friendly state.
2006-10-27 20:07:04 · answer #1 · answered by sochiswim 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The crumple of the financial gadget became by way of housing industry crumple greater desirable than something. And that became by way of issues like Fannie and Freddie alongside with Democrat rules greater often than no longer that strongly sell an unsustainable point of undesirable loans (severe risk loans that for the time of all risk could desire to on no account be paid returned). It became large on an identical time as housing costs persisted to enhance over the years, yet one dip could desire to throw all of it out of whack and that's exactly what befell. think of approximately it.. how could desire to the drop in a house value in all risk positioned somebody into foreclosures? The charge would not exchange. except you're a moron and have been given an pastime basically or an ARM very own loan by way of fact it made your charge decrease. after all, if no longer for the likes of Fannie/Freddie/Barney Frank and corporation the housing industry dip could have been little greater desirable than that.. a dip in costs. instead the backside fell out by way of each and all the undesirable loans. And that cascaded onto something of the financial gadget. besides.. Bush's optimal deficit became $450 billion in 2008. meanwhile 2009 and 2010 are the two $a million.4+ trillion deficit years. finding returned at Bush responsible won't resolve something by way of fact he's not the single right here now doing no longer something yet slapping a "desire and alter" label on the Bushmobile and stomping even harder on the gas.
2016-10-16 11:57:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Removed Saddam Hussein from power.
Discovered that N. Korea was pursuing nuclear weapons.
Created drug coverage for Medicare.
Continued to expand the economy.
Increased oil reserves.
Negotiated bilateral trade agreements with numerous countries.
Prosecuted executives from Enron and other companies.
Created a fund for families of victims of 9/11.
Just a few things I could think of. BTW, I'm not a Republican and not planning on voting Republican this election. Just wanted to post some points for fairness.
2006-10-27 20:07:39 · answer #3 · answered by picopico 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What's the point? You're not asking this question because you want to know, but to make a statement about how evil Bush is, and how evil Republicans are. I can name MORE than ten good things Republicans have done! But as I said, what's the point?
2006-10-27 20:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is very easy:
1.George W. Bush makes Bill Clinton looks good.
2.George W. Bush makes Jimmy Carter looks good.
3.George W. Bush makes Lyndon B. Johnson looks good.
4.George W. Bush makes John F. Kennedy looks good.
5.George W. Bush makes Harry S. Truman looks good.
6.George W. Bush makes Franklin D. Roosevelt looks good.
7.George W. Bush makes Woodrow Wilson looks good.
8.George W. Bush makes Grover Cleveland looks good.
9.George W. Bush makes Grover Cleveland looks good.
10.George W. Bush makes George Washington looks like a god.
All of this is done by George W Bush in the last 6 years alone and he is only one republican president out of many. And the Iraq War cost the US at least one trillion so far (this is a conservative estimate).
2006-10-27 20:02:10 · answer #5 · answered by smart son of a bich 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey dumbass , being you have no clue it is over 3 trillion dollars. Then again Clinton spent 2 trillion with out a war. So shut the **** up and get an education.
2006-10-27 21:03:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
republicans vote in lock step????
I see were you come from.
Republicans in no way vote in lock step if they did Bill would have never been in office. Ross Perot split off a large part of the vote.
Yes they have spent way to much But to vote for a Democrat that has no clue of what to do no way. If they do tell us what it is not just bash the Bush.
2006-10-27 20:03:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ten good things that Republicans have done in the past 6 years? I can't even name one.
2006-10-27 19:59:52 · answer #8 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ahh aaaaaahhhhaaaaaa? It's an 8 trillion deficit. AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH? The department of Homeland Buffoonery?
2006-10-27 19:58:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not Trillions, but Billions. MUUAHHHAHHHH. Oh wait, a Trillion is worth more than a Billion. Damnit!
2006-10-27 19:57:45 · answer #10 · answered by NightTrainWooWoo 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋