i'm not a fan of bush myself, but for crissakes i'm so sick of the same old tired rantings. i can't turn on the tv, radio, or computer without hearing some anti bush rhetoric. liberals try to blame him personally for EVERYTHING. someone slips on a banana peel they'll blame bush. why can't they just come out and admit it. theyre still mad over losing the last two elections. all this anti bush rhetoric is just a push to regain power. any idiot can figure that out. and please do me and yourself a favor and don't list off his "failures" i've seen them a jillion times. and for the record, i don't listen to rush so don't use that excuse. all this ranting about bush reminds me of a child throwing a tantrum for not getting his way. like how they act when their mom sends them to their room. why can't we just let things run their course and stop all this childish ranting?
2006-10-27 18:35:14 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well said, I couldn't agree more.
2006-10-27 18:38:53 · answer #1 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
he's barely been out of workplace for 3 years, enable's wait yet another 4 years. to date as Iraq, the large Democrats, even "Hanoi Kerry". It became surpassed by seventy six votes and that they could have stopped it. they say they have been afraid if all went nicely they may be injury in the polls. now it quite is a sturdy reason to vote for some thing once you're a Democrat. i admire them bashing him because it shows how vulnerable barry is. to date as polls he's quite decrease than Bush's low factor yet with the left media what do you assume. This modern-day handle the funds is in simple terms yet another incorrect flow on his area. yet you're perfect, this in simple terms proves affirmative action is previous-formed and needs to be stopped NOW! it quite is one element to make a mistake a corporation or an area of the rustic yet no longer the finished u . s .
2016-10-16 11:56:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So your idea is that we simply ignore all of the substantial failings of this government and 'just let things run their course?' Seriously are you retarded? You are actually suggesting that when someone does an utterly crap job, we just ignore it and hope that things will turn out okay?
If you owned a business and one of your employees showed up late for work, drained the profits of your business, and made decisions that hurt your business, would you let things run their course then?
These politicians, from the President on down are supposed to be representing the best interest of the people. Bush has not done this. By almost any measure of a leader he has done a horrendous job. Those that criticize him are not making stuff up, they are merely voicing legitimate concern.
This is not about partisan politics or whose 'side' you are on. This is about evaluating a public servant and critiquing their job performance. When a politician is doing a crappy job, it is the duty of every citizen to voice their concern and ensure that this politician is removed from office.
Suggesting that we blindly follow our leaders, never question them, and decide not to hold them accountable for their screw ups, is the reason we are in such a bad shape. People like you need to read a history book, and see what happens when people allow inept leaders to do whatever the hell they like.
2006-10-27 20:03:58 · answer #3 · answered by ZCT 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The difference with the Clinton bashing was that he deserved it. The man cheated on his wife. Like my Mom always said how could we trust him if his own wife couldn't. Not to mention the fact that his policies were way out of whack on everything. So, I'm tired of the Bush bashing because he's done nothing wrong. In fact, our country is ten times better off than when he took office.
2006-10-27 18:50:35 · answer #4 · answered by iuneedscoachknight 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush isn't the first president, nor will he be the last to get bashed.
Clinton got bashed just as much, if not moreso, than Bush. The Republicans blamed him for everything from the weather to the baseball strike.
Don't go singling out Bush bashing, because the Republicans did the same thing in the 90s and there were many of us tired of the crybabying they did about Clinton.
2006-10-27 18:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I guess you don't mind the constant bashing of Clinton that's gone on about 3 times as long?
I'm a little tired of that personally... come back in ten years, then I'll feel bad for you...
Cinner: I was just pointing out the pure hypocracy of the statement... I've heard Clinton blamed for everything that's gone wrong for the past 15 or so years... and they all sound like children throwing a tantrum too...
2006-10-27 18:38:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
I do not consider it Bush bashing if it is backed up by facts. However, if it is just a comment on his personal life, I ignore it. It is amazing that we still have a lot of Gore and Clinton bashing. Remember? They are no longer pres and vice pres.
2006-10-27 19:02:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i am not a big fan either. But I support out nation's leader. If not who is going to run this nation Rossie O'Dumbell ?
2006-10-27 19:19:34 · answer #8 · answered by caciansf 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we got rid of all the Bush basher questions on here, the opposition wouldn't have anything else to talk about...
Maybe then the rest of us could figure out some solutions...
2006-10-27 18:42:12 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Personally, it IS a little sickening, but there is an election coming up and this is just what certain people want; especially the insurgents. They know more than what we give them credit for.
2006-10-27 18:40:13 · answer #10 · answered by Nancy D 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
AMEN to that ! And an excellent analogy with the kid's tantrum, too.
United We Stand - you know the rest.
Unfortunately, the constant Bush bashers don't.
2006-10-27 18:39:39 · answer #11 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋