Unregulated or independent fashion industries is without an equivalent of oversight body when it comes to change present body stereo types, whose certain axiomatic characteristics are lauded and encouraged.
Contentious discursive(to get the ball rolling): Fashion media whets the appetite and provides the next fix for popular culture. It provides jobs in a multimillion dollar industry. The loss of a few are justifiable gains in the pursuit of gainful employment and fulfilling sensory and intellectual lust. Culture is best served by a democratic vote.(in the dollar or pound.)
What is your opinion ?
Obiter Dictum: The last time full figured models seen on the catwalk was in the 1980s like Cindy Crawford and Claudia Schiffer. Heroin chic portrayed on a size 0 in the1990s with Kate Moss. Madrid's ban on models with with BMI of under 18 meant models qualifying for catwalks could not weigh less than 52kg with minum entry height of 1.74m. The likes of Kate Moss were discouraged.
2006-10-27 17:39:14 · 2 answers · asked by pax veritas 4 in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
I think that media portrayal and latest fashion trends, cause a lot more drama for some people than they should. The media portrays women to be beautiful if they've got a tiny waist, and slightly large breasts or butt. And it's unjustified. A lot of latest fashion trends are meant for the skinnier of women, but it also has negative aspects on guys too. A guy can't be sexy without muscles or a sixpack, and I think it's bogus. This kind of got off topic but oh well.
2006-10-29 16:00:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't that the whole point of the fashion industry? To tell us what to buy, and make sure there's always something new, different, and absolutely "necessary" next season???
2006-10-28 00:46:39 · answer #2 · answered by Angela M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋