....communities of faithful believers to behave like racist, heterofascist, warmongers running a race to Armageddon?
Please explain to me: How is being a racist, heterofascist, warmonger running a race to Armageddon morally superior to being a liberal, homotolerant, lover?
2006-10-27
17:10:35
·
24 answers
·
asked by
H.I. of the H.I.
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Attention reading comprehension challenged, I never used the phrase "all conservatives" or "all liberals". That is in your mind not mine.
2006-10-27
17:54:46 ·
update #1
Very good question... and very similar to a point I try to get across about campaign, manipulation and propaganda tactics.
Rove has been manipulating the masses for 30 years now; since the 70s. He has stated openly that feeding ppl's prejudices and using those prejudices as vote motivators makes ppl vote those prejudices and forget all other issues.
My point is that when a society is continual bred this hatred... the result is division, hate and eventually social civil war that we are seeing today.
2006-11-04 08:58:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
When you ask a question like that, you DO encompass all Conservatives. If you had said SOME Conservatives, you'd get a pass. Therefore as I Conservative I can't answer this question, since I am none of those things you accuse us of being. But I will tell you this. When liberal idiots like BJ Clinton give countries like North Korea nuke technology, it is the liberals that are bringing us ever closer to the brink due to their stupid naivety, not the "warmonger" Conservatives.
2006-10-29 10:10:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Boof 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a conservative. I am not a racist. My best friend is an african-american. I am not a heterofascist. My sister is a lesbian. I am not a warmonger. Although I support the war...I DO NOT love war. I am not racing to Armageddon. I am living day by day just like most Americans.
Now, why are libs like you so intollerant of conservative's faith? Do you feel threatened by it. I thought your people loved everyone. Or is it just immoral people you want to associate with?
2006-10-28 00:58:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You don't remember the Carter administration do you. And I am sure you have forgotten George Wallace standing on the steps of the University of Alabama to help keep the black students out. Ten years later he was the Democrats leading candidate until some racist, hetero fascist, warmonger shot him to keep him out of the Oval Office.
2006-10-28 00:45:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by tim b 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I consider myself to be very conservative. I don't agree with anything you've said. To suggest that anyone is interested in running a "race to Armageddon," is preposterous.
As far as your values judgment question--it cannot be answered logically as it starts with the same faulty premise.
This leaves open only one of 2 possibilities: Either you are this delusional or you really don't want a real answer to your question.
2006-10-28 01:33:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, most of my conservative friends judge people on whether or not they are a burden to society or not. I have friends that are from different Countries, different colors, different political views. Conservatives also do not promise the moon and the starts to the poor and the blacks to get their votes than do nothing for them except to raise their taxes and make them more reliant on the Government.
Most of the conservatives will fight when we are attacked. We prefer talking if possible, but we do not condone apologizing for our way of live. Some, like me could give a rats *** if someone is doing a guy or a girl just do not call it marriage and I am fine. Give them the same rights as a married person.
Finally, unlike most liberals that I know, conservatives talk using facts and figures based on hard numbers and minimize the twisting of facts to prove their point of view.
2006-10-28 00:22:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by andy 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
as you our perception of morality is just a tad higher! i am no racist,if you are a piece of trash then that is what you are,last i looked there wasn't a color barrier! if you want to be a homosexual fine but dont add any laws to make me feel like i have to like it! as for being a warmonger i did my deal in iraq in the first go round so i feel i have my say,you weren't there and are clueless! and if you are familiar with Armageddon,which i doubt you would know who it would come from right? where does it say the united states! it doesn't! yes i am heterosexual and glad i am!sorry penis and azzhole doesn't excite me!
2006-10-28 00:22:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Sorry, but I don't buy that all Liberals are homo-tolerant, and lovers. I know too many liberals who are just the opposite and many Conservatives who are not racist, hetero-fascists, or warmongers. Stop generalizing.
2006-10-28 00:33:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by mocha5isfree 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
The values that I and every other Republican stand by has nothing to do with racism. We have done more to free minorities than any liberal. Do you remember President Lincoln that freed the slaves? He was a Republican. Do you remember how the democrats fought against civil rights in the 60's? I doubt it. I do believe in going to war when we have to in order to protect America from any threat. You do not see Republicans pandering to minorities and keeping them in poverty by giving them welfare and providing no incentive to work or become educated. It is the black leadership and the democrats that keep minorities suppressed for their own gain. Republicans believe all races are Americans and we want everyone (except for democrats) to succeed. If anyone is hateful and intolerant it is you and your kind. I am glad to see that you are a homo-tolerant lover (whatever that is) at least you have one redeeming value.
2006-10-28 00:24:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Well that a nice straw man, which you have torn into like a pack of flying monkeys.
But before you choke on all that straw. Consider that in being a liberal you put yourself against liberty. You think the government should take what one man has earned and give it to someone who didn't earn it. So that all we earn and our very lives become the property of the State.
In opposing religion you don't seek freedom of religion but freedom from religion. Do do that you need to replace an All Mighty God with an All Mighty Government. And such an unlimited government always results in tyranny.
2006-10-28 00:21:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Roadkill 6
·
6⤊
0⤋