i think america has created the taliban (osama bin laden) during the cold war with Rassia.America has also created saddam during iran-iraq war. america is also the best friend of the most human right violators(saudi arabia)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-27 16:03:08 · 9 answers · asked by JUSTICE 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
This country has been turned by two of the most powerful and civilised nations on Earth into the most hellish place on Earth. Armies claiming to bring democracy and prosperity have brought bloodshed and a misery worse than under the most ruthless modern dictator. This must be the stupidest paradox in modern history. Neither America nor Britain has the guts to rule Iraq properly, yet they lack the guts to leave.Blair speaks of staying until the job is finished. What job? The only job he can mean is his own.simon.jenkins@guardian.co.uk
2006-10-27 17:06:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saudi Arabia is the home of Wahabism the most radical form of Islam in the world and breeding ground of terrorists and the US and Saudi Arabia do almost nothing about it. Terrorist go to Saudi Arabia to Wahabi to learn the philosophy of terrorism and then go get on the job training in Iraq. Wahabism is worse than the Taliban and they are left virtually alone to do what they want in full view of the Saudi Govt.
2006-10-27 23:16:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We helped the Taliban defeat the USSR. And this is how they repay us.
We helped Saddam as well.
See what ungrateful backstabbing jerks the Muslims are?
You have proved by your statement that the opposite of your premise is true.
Try seeing life thru something besides hate.
2006-10-27 23:26:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Looks like you have been doing some homework. The truth is often hard to find, but if you look hard enough, it's there. You sometimes have to go to the dusty old back shelves at universities to find older books where the truth had yet to be rewritten.
2006-10-27 23:13:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're reminding me of Hubert Humphrey, "the Happy Warrior," who was once described, very accurately in my opinion, as a man who never had an unexpressed thought. You don't want to sound like Hubert, do you?
2006-10-27 23:11:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no easy answer to that.
It depends on one hand on geopolitics at crucial times and places and on the other on what to be gained at the expense of others. (even if it means atrocities as a result). No one is truly black or white... In politics, grey is the color of choice.
2006-10-27 23:09:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the muhlas are provoking it, and the mindless sheep are responding by the thousands
2006-10-28 02:05:16 · answer #7 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is possible but I'm undecided till the courts and jury come to try the issue and come to a decision
2006-10-27 23:14:00 · answer #8 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Before, when US has interest in these terrorists, were called "freedom fighters"......But now, they are named "terrorists", because US interest is fulfilled. Now, imigine who is responsible for it ?
2006-10-28 00:30:49 · answer #9 · answered by mrktk44 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋