Well, they're both obselete and going nowhere :)
2006-10-27 15:14:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by indygocean 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have seen Stonehenge with my own eyes. I am still not convinced that the war on terror is simply that or an excuse to invade another country that has valuable resources. I vote for Stonehenge because it's, at least, what it claims to be.
2006-10-28 18:31:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ragdollfloozie is Pensive! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, unless there is a current event related to Stonehenge that I"m not aware of, I would say the War on Terror. Since it relates to modern events that can shape our immediate future.
2006-10-27 22:17:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Odindmar 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stonehenge.
2006-10-27 23:05:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by West Coast Nomad 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
to save stonehenge or to end war on terror? or is stonehenge more important in the grand scheme of things or is the war on terror something people will wonder about for eons? depends on your perspective entirely and what you personally believe is more important. me? neither, i'm worried about the outcome of the st. louis detroit game.
2006-10-27 22:24:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by tenpen_10 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush has turned this "war" into his personal crusade to get his name in the history books as a great President. Under that light, I think that Stonehenge is more important than one man's arrogant crusade.
2006-10-28 06:11:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war on Terror.
2006-10-27 22:15:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by fthsunshine@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stonehenge of course....not only is it older...it will still be around LONG after the "war on terror" is forgotten by everyone....AND it is far more relivant....
2006-10-28 01:29:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by kveldulfgondlir 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think probably Stonehenge. The probability that we would find an answer to that mystery greatly outways the probability of finding one for or to stop terrorism. Sad, isn't it?
2006-10-27 23:43:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by qpi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hands down. Stonehenge.
it at least serves a puropse as a strong symbol.
the war on terror is really more like the kids playing cops and robbers with plastic guns than an actual war.
make the war effective and then i will say that it is importent
2006-10-27 22:46:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WAR ON TERROR OR WAR TO CREATE TERROR?
2006-10-27 22:16:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by cicho658 2
·
0⤊
0⤋