hell no!has repeatedly lied to the American people .enough said.
2006-10-27 15:05:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
You mean The Village Idiot, the Crawford Clown, the Great Orator, the Decider? Can't stand the s-o-b.
He's taken this country down the road to ruin faster than can be imagined while selling out to Big Oil. He's a phony born-again Christian who used the Christian Right to get elected and now laughs about it. He's gotten us in a never-ending war that will make the VietNam War look like a weekend training camp for the National Guard. He used the 9/11 tragedy to set out on his little vendetta against Saddam Hussein, whom he said he was going to get on his first day in office. Meanwhile, he was a coward who used his daddy's influence to get him in the Air National Guard during the VietNam War and he went AWOL while campaigning for Congressional candidates in Alabama - bailed out by daddy. He's an admitted drunk and cocaine user - good role model for the kids. He doesn't give a crap about the American people. If he did, why hasn't he done something for the large majority of the Katrina victims who are still waiting for help? He's taken a massive budget surplus left over from the Clinton administration and all but put the country into bankruptcy with the largest deficit in history. He's made this country the laughingstock of the world with his mispronounced words and mangled sentences which make no more sense than they would if they were said by a 3-year-old. He's taken education to a new low with his love of standardized tests so that kids come out of school now knowing next to nothing other than how to take a test.
Definitely a loser and history will show him to be the WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY.
2006-10-28 00:28:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Because he has shamed this nation among the eyes of its own citizens and other countries. He has continually lied to the american people, and there is no way u cant deny that no matter how you look at it. Republicans claim that Clinton's sex scandal was bad? well clinton was by far a BETTER president than Bush on any given situation, if u think the sex scandal was bad? well wat about the more than 1200 soldiers killed, 15000 wounded, and thousands among thousands of Iraqs dead- thats something to consider, wat about lying about the WMD and going to war. Clinton lied about an AFFAIR WITH A WOMAN NOT A NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIR/excuse, which one is the worst? Please, get over urself and start seeing the facts, not opinions that Bush is a mindless idiot that follows the consent of his egocentric party and has done nothing positive which has had an impact on me or any other american citizen which i know of. i dont need to be a republican or democrat to figure that one out
2006-10-27 22:18:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by balanced112 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
I do not like Bush. I find that him and his government take a very simplistic approach to international affairs. He offers very simple solutions to very complex problems. This division between good guys and bad guys narrows debate and hamstrings appropriate political action. On the issue of terrorism, I believe the root cases are corrupt and violent groups wanted to force a change in belief. This comes from backward governments (Taliban) alienation of the population (Most suicide bombers are educated young men) and poverty.
Bush has seemed to completely forget that military force is only one tool, and that the American society has much more than than bombs to address this problem.
2006-10-27 22:13:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Just Wondering 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
No. Because I think that the Iraqi conflict speaks for itself. The premise for the war was admitted to be untrue by the President and the administration, even though it may have been a mistake. I still hold him responsible for the death of Americans. The Iraqi conflict could have been avoided at less costs.
2006-10-27 22:21:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by C J 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, I do not like him. First and foremost, His christian ideals threaten my religion. I am pagan and most christians of his ilk believe that I should not have the same rights to worship that they do. Second, He lied to us about WMD's in Iraq. A lie is a lie. Whether it was Clinton lying about getting a Lewinsky, or Bush about starting another war before completing the first one in Afghanistan, lying is wrong. Third and finally, his economic policies have destroyed the economy that the three presidents before him worked so hard to improve.
2006-10-27 22:12:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by corvuequis 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
That is a hard question to answer. I am 65 years old and have been a Republican in the Deep South since I turned 21 and believe me I was very unpopular for doing so back then. I really don't like much of what Bush has done and I am very disappointed in what he HAS NOT DONE. And that is why he is in trouble with his own party. Not because of what he has done but because of what he HAS FAILED TO DO.
Having said that I must add everything is relative these days. My dislike for Mr Bush pales by comparison to my absolute loathing of Mr. Kerry aka Hanoi John. I will go to my grave loathing that man and others like him for what he did and said about us Vietnam Vets back in the '60s and '70s. I and many others will never forgive them for that dastardly betrayal. I did not even have to hold my nose when I voted for Bush and that is saying a lot.....an awful lot.
2006-10-27 22:18:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by barrettins 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
"As democracy is perfected, the office of the president represents, more and more closely, the inne! r soul o f the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
2006-10-27 22:17:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I wouldnt say thay I like him or dislike him... Yes, he has made mistakes but that is no reason to hate him... He has done a good job with Homeland Security and keeping our country safe after 9/11...
2006-10-27 22:57:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes and No. Yes because I think he was handed a turd sandwich when he took over office and has dealt with it pretty well since (i.e. the terrorist situation that President Clinton didnt handle to begin with.). No, because the Iraq war has been handled horribly wrong. I believe we should have gone in like we did, but there should have been a plan shortly after the actual war ending that we would have begun to hand things over to the UN or a very broad coalition (other than a U.S. led one).
2006-10-27 22:11:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by e260aaw 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
There has not been another attack on American Soil since 9/11/01. Mr. Bush is responsible for our saftey.
Everything else is politics
2006-10-27 22:17:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by e_guanajuato 3
·
2⤊
2⤋