why doesn't Oklahoma ,new mexico,Missippi,Kentucky have a team?
2006-10-27 14:32:20 · 6 answers · asked by C.D. Riley 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No. And if they did, I doubt those sites would be high on the NFL's list. It's all about TV money. Los Angeles is easily the first choice. After that, maybe Portland or San Antonio, and those are hardly big TV markets.
2006-10-27 14:41:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The NFL has recently looked into moving a team to Los Angeles. The governor of CA said he is dedicated to bring a team to Los Angeles. So probably in the next 5 years there will be a team in LA.
2006-10-27 15:10:15 · answer #2 · answered by matt f 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There have been talks of the NFL coming back to Los Angeles for a few years now. L.A. is too big of a market not to have a team, so if anywhere gets a new franchise my money is on the city of angels.
2006-10-27 14:37:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they are.
Los Angeles is a bigger market than any of the other places you mentioned. One would think they'd try to do LA first.
Personally, I hope they don't put it in Los Angeles. I hope they put it in Anaheim. There's definitely room for a new stadium next to Angel Stadium. It'd be better commute for me if I wanted to go to the games, and I want to keep the Coliseum for USC.
2006-10-27 21:09:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure about expansion teams, but it would be super if the CFL and NFL join together
2006-10-28 09:49:16 · answer #5 · answered by Jorginho 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't beleive so but I have heard that a couple of teams want to move to LA. One of them will get the nod.
2006-10-27 14:58:19 · answer #6 · answered by 10 to 20 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋