English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could it be the vaccination program that other countries do not? Could it be other countries are more homogenized?
What do you think?

2006-10-27 14:18:32 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

20 answers

I would really like to see where you get your "facts" from. Could you give us a little more info on this?

2006-10-27 14:43:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

personally i believe it is because statistically the US has more children every year.
As for your other argument infant mortality went down after vaccinations were put into place. And as mor homogenized i think that is false to because you look at other things in the animal kingdom like dogs. Full breeds have more sickness and die years sooner than muts . Muts get the best genes form each dog rather than the same ones over and over. I believe the same can be applied to humans. Look at Jews they have a High breast cancer rate and i believe the majority of the women have the breast cancer gene. If they would intermarry more that would cut down on that genetic anomaly. African American a small percentage suffer from sickle cell anemia you have to get it from both parents to have it. That would not occur with an interracial marriage. So mixing is actually better for the races

2006-10-27 17:53:07 · answer #2 · answered by Big Daddy R 7 · 0 0

I am not sure where you got your information, but some further study is recommended. I've included links to the latest World Health Organization infant mortality tables and the CDC's recent supplemental findings on the U.S. infant mortality rate. You'll see that while the U.S. lags slightly behind some other western countries, the difference in all western countries is no more than 0.04%. Also, the U.S. is not dead last among western countries. The CDC found that much of the difference can be attributed to better prenatal care in the U.S. Low birthweight babies in the U.S. have a much higher chance of making it to full term than in any other country. Less than full-term babies (i.e., miscarriages) are not counted in the infant mortality rate. Many babies that would never make it to term in other countries are born and grow into perfectly healthy children in the U.S. The downside of this, of course is that many babies that would be miscarried in other countries, make it to term in the U.S. only to survive a few days.
I hope this helps your research.

2006-10-27 16:05:28 · answer #3 · answered by FabMom 4 · 0 0

The US counts premature births that result in the death of the infant where as other countries count those as miscarriages and not "infant mortality". In short, the other Western countries compile their numbers differently then the US. The US has higher expectations that's why it appears to have a high infant mortality rates.

Check Wikipedia, even it explains this.

2006-10-27 14:22:44 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1 0

The United States does not have the highest infant mortality rate of any westernized county. Check out the CDC web site and search infant mortality.

2006-10-27 14:38:17 · answer #5 · answered by Lori H 3 · 2 0

It's called drug's and the fact that we as a society do not watch are kids like we should. We all have some one else watching are children who probably aren't qualified. UN like third world country's where all they have is time and family. We as a society need to raise are own kids and except responsibility for are children infant, toddler, and child alike. We also need to send all the parents out there who leave there infants in the car cooking in the sun to jail and start setting the example of whats to come if we don't start to except Responsibility for are own children. It all boils down to this RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!

2006-10-27 14:26:33 · answer #6 · answered by matt v 3 · 0 0

The US is between Israel and Italy and within 10% of New Zealand. The fact is that infant mortality isn't the highest ranking indicator in our stack of fundamentals. We prefer to emphasize 'availability of abortion clinics' rather than pre-natal care centers. But even with that, we are 184 out of 222. I would rather have us up at 5.1 with the EU, but 6.4 is pretty good, as well.

2006-10-27 14:34:47 · answer #7 · answered by Zivien 3 · 1 0

We don't have the highest infant mortallity rate of any Westernized country, theres your answer

2006-10-27 14:23:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Could it be that others countries are more committed in preventing infant mortality than the US is?

2006-10-27 14:20:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

usa has a one hundred% little one mortality fee, comparable through fact something of the international. And for anybody who desires to refute this actuality, attempt watching the figures on little one Immortality. they're undeniably 0%. right here is the place I ought to rather say "Sorry for being a smartarse, yet", and roll out some nauseatingly pedantic excuse for being a such d!ck, yet all of us recognize it could be a bare confronted lie. desire this facilitates.

2016-12-28 06:51:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We still have a healthy share of poverty in this country. Check out some of the inner cities. The news of finding a baby in the trashcan is quite common. Even though the US is my favorite country, the downside to Capitalism is there's no guarantee any of us will succeed, some just lose.

2006-10-27 14:21:58 · answer #11 · answered by Action 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers