Explain!
2006-10-27 14:02:04 · 18 answers · asked by AZRAEL è 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
UFO's, cause its arrogant to think we are alone in the universe, let alone a multi-verse.
Whereas the largest evidence of Lochie was proven to be a hoax
2006-10-28 01:16:43 · answer #1 · answered by Mike J 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well since UFO stands for unexplained flying object then there's no doubt that they exist. No doubt at all.
If I threw a sock past your bedroom window and you didn't know what it was you could call it a UFO and it would be until you figured out what it was.
However you are probably meaning the unexplained objects of the alien or flying saucer variety right?
They are both equally plausable. The loch ness monster.. maybe a bit less though.
They've done tests and nothing has ever really shown up. It's really more of a myth or a case of mistaken identity (seal.. weird wave etc) but I wouldn't be surprised if they discovered Nessie.
I don't think there's any doubt that aliens and stuff exist, but a lot of the time the sightings and photos are faked so it's hard to tell. The ones that are real imo are the lights that you see wizzing around together.
2006-10-27 14:10:54 · answer #2 · answered by Fluffy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but I don't shop on Ebay. You would think after all this time that they would have found the Loch Ness Monster. Maybe it's really a UFO or USO by aliens with a sense of humor.
2006-10-27 15:58:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
UFO's are more plausible. Because the Loch Ness Monster has been around forever............ well a long time anyway, and nothing can live for that long. UFO's............ well its a huge universe out there - we can't be the only planet with life!
2006-10-27 14:40:37 · answer #4 · answered by Lost and found 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
UFO, by that I presume you mean the flying disk. Since we have never had any direct communication with these people they are implausible but not improbable. I believe in them myself but when you look at something you must look at the known facts not the believed facts.
Loch ness monster is impossible, the rivers are to small for it to get out. There has been no body found. and there are not enough fish to sustain such a large creature.
UFO of the two
2006-10-27 14:14:46 · answer #5 · answered by jamie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both equal i think. loch ness is huge, extremely deep and murky so it could take people forever to search for a monster down there! And they still may never find it. UFOs could also be anywhere in space, which is huge also and although there have been lots of "sightings" who knows which is real??
2006-10-28 14:36:52 · answer #6 · answered by **gotik_ems** 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately the Loch Ness Monster! There is so much that lies undiscovered at the bottom of the sea and lakes ....... and yet in every sense they are so close to home. What lies out there is space is the little we know and the infinite that we don't. So on balance, Nessie wins hands down!
2006-10-27 14:16:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both I'd say but at least the Loch Ness Monster is confined to one place
2006-10-28 18:12:35 · answer #8 · answered by cino_bean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bigfoot flying a UFO is more plausable.
How would the Loch Ness even fly a space craft? He doesn't have any arms.
2006-10-27 14:06:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this stage in time, neither as there is no real evidence either exists (UFO as in 'alien spacecraft'). However I do feel there is more chance of a UFO sighting in the future than ever finding evidence of Nessie.
2006-10-27 14:16:15 · answer #10 · answered by mark_virgin 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋