do you think there should be more campaign spending limits??
2006-10-27 12:57:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Good question......yes I do because of the abusive negative campaigns....these politicians forgot the reason they are running......they need to educate us about what they stand for....not for how bad their opponent is..........most Americans are fed up with these negative campaigns......it amazes me how much the advertising industry seems to run our lives anyway........yes, there should be more campaign spending limits....need to address the contents of these commercials....they are sinister.
2006-10-27 13:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by jazi 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think there should be some limit so that politicians with less money could compete fairly with politicians with more. I also think there needs to be firm rules about truth in advertising. If a politician is caught in a lie concerning another politician, he should be either fined or thrown out of the election.
America has had it with lying politicians and they need to be stopped on the campaign trail rather than after they are in office. When did mud slinging become so en vogue?
2006-10-27 13:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they are freaking annoying and thats all commercials are now. They all shouldn't be in office spending millions just for those commercials when that money could go to so much better things
2006-10-27 13:01:58 · answer #3 · answered by xexlxmx 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All campaign commercials should be limited to what your position is and what you have voted for or against and not conjecture about what your opponent will or will not do.
2006-10-27 13:25:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It seems like these days, the rich run our government. Regular people dont have money for gallas, many commercials, flyers, mail outs, campain pencils and what nots, campain parties and... dare i say it... bribing. We pick people based on not only their platforms and campaining, but silly things like who they slept with or if when they were a teenager they experimented with drugs. to me, that seems more normal. mistakes are human nature. i dont th8ink whether or not u slept with someone you wernt supposed to changes the way you govern a country. lately, i think that money governs our country, not politions
and thats my 2 cents
2006-10-27 13:13:31 · answer #5 · answered by Ashley W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why does a mendacity damnocrat might desire to apply Reagan to get elected? it may't be detrimental despite the fact that that's an underhanded trick via the left used to get votes. yet another component permission might desire to be granted to apply something linked with Reagan, and that has no longer handed off!
2016-11-26 00:01:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there should be a committee that reviews every political commercial and approves it or disapproves it based on if they are talking about what they do or what their opposition does not do.
2006-10-27 13:00:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they should be outlawed completely. It's sickening.
Now that we have access to the internet, people can look up the candidate's history and voting records.
We DON'T need them trying to hornswaggle us by throwing all that BS at us. I find it very offensive.
I♥♫→mia☼☺†
2006-10-27 13:01:07 · answer #8 · answered by mia2kl2002 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You said it. Is there anyone who is not sick and tired of it by now every time they turn on the TV?
2006-10-27 13:03:54 · answer #9 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are no more annoying than the numerous ambulance chaser ads on TV.
2006-10-27 13:25:30 · answer #10 · answered by rrticulate1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋