His career numbers are MUCH better than Joe Namath, and he has a ring. So, is he an eventual (let's say 15-20 years down the road) HoFer?
2006-10-27 12:22:08 · 9 answers · asked by Ike 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Brad doesn't have a shot at it. He's been a good player, but not a great one.
2006-10-27 12:24:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
His chances of making the hall are no better than mine.
Namath played in a different era, apples and oranges. I saw Namath play, he was a star. Brad Johnson is a manager. You pay him not to make mistakes. You pay a Namath to win the game, big big difference.
2006-10-28 00:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by TG Special 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am just as close to the HOF as Johnson is....and I have never played a down of professional football.
Not to mention that I am still scratching my head over why Namath is a HOFer. IMO...he did nothing to deserve it.
2006-10-27 19:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by Fantasy Sports Icon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the Hall of Fame is in Ohio, and Brad Johnson plays in Minnesota, I'm guessing maybe 700 miles or so. But I could be wrong.
2006-10-27 21:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brad Johnson will never ever me in the Hall of Fame.
2006-10-27 19:35:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadly I must agree with these people, however your Namath comparison is very valid and the board should realize that.
2006-10-27 19:44:59 · answer #6 · answered by Andy T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not close at all. He has a Super Bowl title, but that's about it. His decent stats are good, but nothing to brag about. He certainly doesn't join the ranks of quarterbacks like Young, Favre, Marino, Montana, Starr, etc.
2006-10-27 19:27:24 · answer #7 · answered by petkunm 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not by a long shot. He may have had a great season but not HOF material
2006-10-28 23:34:21 · answer #8 · answered by kocul 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell no
2006-10-27 20:31:50 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋