does bush care about the 40 million americans with no health insurance?

Answer 1

Yes-- he cares a great deal that these people might wake up one day and link themselves not having insurance to his party's blocking any and all legislation that would have brought such coverage to them under the Clinton administration several years back !!!
They called it fiscally irresponsible at the same time as pushing like the dickens for the Major tax cut for the wealthiest of Americans--- which they eventually enacted in Bush's first term in office just before strapping the American middle class with the single largest run-up on the national debt in history !!!

Answer 2

Does that 40 million count the 15-20 million illegals that are bankrupting our health system so there is nothing left for Americans.

Answer 3

Gov. Mitt Romney, Republican was able to pass an intelligent health plan for his state which not only covers virtually everyone but was fiscally better for the state! Rising health care costs are not just a right or responsibility, it's a fiscally responsible duty. And does the US really want to be behind other developed countries?

Answer 4

I am one of those 40 million without health insurance. I do not want it from the gov't. The last thing this country needs is a massive HMO serving 300 million people... run by the US gov't.

Answer 5

Excuse me but how is that this President's problem ? There is no RIGHT in the constitution that guarantees you, me or anyone health insurance. What's next, a government provided car, house, food, TV, computer etc ?



Excuse me White61water ? How is my lack of an avatar and my "generic" profile any of your concern ? But just FYI I am a 45 year old male, college educated, working, home owner. My taxes are supposed to be for defense, infrastructure etc.... You failed to address the points I made regarding the lack of ANY conceivable right to government provided health care in this country.

Answer 6

Nope and he'd like to take away health insurance from the rest of the country also

Answer 7

wow that road hazza is really feeling his/her oats, with a generic name and no particular identifying avatar I have to assume that it could be a man or a woman who is venting about the guarantees provided by our constitution. Of course there is no provision about health insurance and there also is not any restrictions about driving 95 in a 65mph zone, get real the writers of the bill of rights and the constitution were not fortune tellers, they provided the necessary things for the people of their time and we are actually covered in today's day and age by all of them. Can Mr/Ms hazza list what our taxes are for? Can Mr/Ms hazza list why our boys go to war and get killed or maimed? One thing that Mr/Ms hazza forgets is that everyone has the right to care about the attitudes and feelings of a president who does not give a damn about the people of this country unless it provides him with a revenue source to line his pockets. Mr/Ms hazza should look to Canada where at least they may have high taxes but they give them back to the people in the form of medical services, etc.

Have a good life

Answer 8

About as much as Clinton cared for uninsured, the homeless, aids victims in Africa.. oops forgot Bush have pledge 10 billion to fight aids in Africa that no caring son of a *****.

Answer 9

not accessible to assert, considering that his plan received't artwork. Obama's plan isn't meant to furnish prevalent coverage. What it does do is mandate community score (the coverage organizations ought to promote you coverage) without mandating that you get coverage. seems to me that this would in basic terms encourage human beings to attend till they are sick to signal up, utilising up costs, and utilising insurers out of organisation. in spite of the indisputable fact that your reasoning on fee in line with human being for defense force well being care spending is incorrect. you are able to'd divide defense force well being care spending by technique of the type of squaddies considering that defense force well being care covers many situations more effective than those at present serving- retirees, dependents, defense force cadets, VIP's, and so on. i became a clinical Corps healthcare specialist for 14+ years, so i comprehend. I agree it really is a suitable party of "socialized" drugs correct the following contained in the united states of a and it has its good and undesirable. good: docs do not ought to pressure about even if the affected human being will pay for his or her clinical care. undesirable: lengthy waiting situations, although this became quite corrected throughout the time of my tenure by technique of mandates from above that ensured that sufferers were considered interior of a distinctive era. (in spite of the indisputable fact that there are lengthy waits with inner most coverage too- even as privately insured my daughter had to attend quite a lot 9 months for a component to expertise appointment!) What we do want to communicate about prevalent well being care (not inevitably the most socialized type, with salaried physicians, which has not worked so nicely for the united kingdom), yet possibly a unmarried-payer equipment- not a la Hilary yet with certainly enter (!) from companies and sufferers. i want to hearken to responses from insurers, Obama supporters- am I lacking something?

Answer 10

Given that he hasn't addressed it or even attempted to enact legislation to help cope with the problem, I'd have to say that he doesn't care.