or on pay-per-view?
I think not ... just wondering what you think??
2006-10-27 07:35:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Pay-per-view would be better. Maybe the states could make up the cost for the execution.
2006-10-27 07:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Pay-per-view
2006-10-27 07:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they should be televised. In fact, public hangings served two purposes when they were prevalent. They punished the guilty and they served as a deterrent for other would-be offenders.
2006-10-27 07:39:14 · answer #3 · answered by firestud2829 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
public yes, maybe if some of these half wits saw what its like to be executed they might think twice about killing. make it free though
2006-10-27 07:38:12 · answer #4 · answered by BoTToms UP 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey why not? Give the money to the families effected by the jerk.
2006-10-27 07:38:24 · answer #5 · answered by E.B. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. There's enough violence on TV without showing executions.
2006-10-27 07:37:27 · answer #6 · answered by VLIGER DRAGÖN 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES!! I think it would cut down on crime rate dramatically!
2006-10-27 07:39:08 · answer #7 · answered by SallySue 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
where i live i get to see then live so i dont need tv
2006-10-27 07:39:34 · answer #8 · answered by DefenderOfTheMeek22 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes then people might think before they kill, rape,rob,
2006-10-27 08:10:53 · answer #9 · answered by mawma 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. they should be broadcasted for free.
2006-10-27 07:56:14 · answer #10 · answered by Hando C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋