Keep in mind that Hilary's plan, if elected, is to have gun control. All you NRA members out there...what do you think of that? I don't think any MAN would allow a women to tell them what to do....Bush is a Godly man who is doing what anyone in his position would do...He can only do so much. After all it takes Congress, House of Reps. and Senate to pass anything...The Presidents Veto doesn't really matter in the end...
2006-10-27 06:34:49 · 33 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
the real sad thing is that gw can't run again. the real scary thing is that hilary could get the nod from the loonies. and the most nightmarish scenario is...gulp...she might be elected. woe are we if that ever happens.
2006-10-27 06:41:38 · answer #1 · answered by mott the hoople 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
So does that mean you think men should tell women what to do?Congress is in the hands of the Republicans and has been for 12 years, yes , under Clinton too. Its too late for gun control in this country, everyone has a few at least under the bed, and what does a gun have to do with being Godly? Don't worry about the Presidents veto, hes only used it once in six years.
Surely it would have become him more if he were more concerned about the wellbeing of his country than his place in history as a wartime President. Hillary has certainly had her cross to bear in her husband, but really, don't we all know at least one person who has stayed with a straying husband, sometimes to the dismay of all who know her. Since when is taking your wedding vows seriously a fault? Unless of course you are angry at her for not divorcing him and giving more ammunition to the opposition. I'd vote for Hillary, shes been a good senator from New York, even in the heavily Republican upstate districts. Where they shoot guns.
2006-10-27 08:07:39 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hillary - to paraphrase Vice President Cheney, it's a "no-brainer"!
Bush has achieved nothing to make his country more prosperous or safer; and if all you're worried about is gun control, then I'm afraid you're priorities are sadly warped.
And your understanding of the political system is also lacking if you think that the President does not control policy: after all it is the President who sends most legislation and all nominees to Congress for them to approve or otherwise. Most policies begin in the White House.
As for your sentence "I don't think any MAN would allow a women [it should be woman by the way] to tell them what to do"; does that mean that everybody working in the State Department should just ignore Condoleezza Rice?
2006-10-28 01:07:37 · answer #3 · answered by Timothy M 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As an English woman who doesn't have a vote in the US i am thankful that Bush cannot serve another term from 2008. It would be nice to see a woman President and about time. I think that a lot of middle state americans who believe that men r superior to women wont like it tho! So in my opinion for what its worth, i dont think the majority of guys will vote for a woman whether it be Hilary or any other woman. Shame considering its the 21st century!
2006-10-27 06:48:43 · answer #4 · answered by english_rose10 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hilary, and no doubt about that. Bush must have bought his University degrees because he can‘t even speak English
correctly. His Spanish is not bad and had massive voting
from them. Now he wants to build a wall across the Mexico
USA border, and I think that this is only a monument to his
stupidity. He will likely be insane by the time he reaches 64
(to quote the Beattles) and become a preacher way down
South, near to his wall of ignorance.
2006-10-27 06:53:11 · answer #5 · answered by Ricky 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I am going with Bush. I have seen what a Bush Whitehouse can do and I am not at all pleased. Hillary while being liberal does not make her an evil, ignorant politician. Bush, while being conservative does make him an evil, ignorant politician. It is because of his actions thus far that make me want him out of office.
2006-10-30 05:24:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is more then the NRA ( who I don't agree with even though I own guns) but I don't like washy/ washy people. I like people who stick to their convection's no matter what. You may not & I donot (sometimes) like what GW does but he stayes the course he has set.Hillary changes her mind every time she opens her mouth. She looks at the polls then she decides which side to be on. Just chose a side & stay with it no matter what. As for electing a women President I am all for it if the right one ran & I dont care what party she belongs to.
2006-10-27 07:33:31 · answer #7 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Im neutral because politics is what you dont understand.Anybody including me and you can get power-drunk or power-struck once we get up there.Whether Bush, Hillary, Forrest or whatever obia nye obiaa
2006-10-30 06:18:38 · answer #8 · answered by BeautyBreak H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hilary
I am a little suprised at you.
" don't think any MAN would allow a women to tell them what to do"
So you are saying a real man doesn't listen to women? Are you a woman? Why are even listening to you then?
Get in the kitchen and cook me dinner!
Man that's a bad attitude, do you want to be treated like that?
2006-10-27 06:38:52 · answer #9 · answered by Karce 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hilary without doubt.
A gun is a penis substitute. Any man that feels that he must have one, must have a small penis.
In my opinion Bush & Blair are coming closer every day to killing as many people as Saddam.
2006-10-30 01:54:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hilary,
i couldnt stand bush another 4 years, but i wont be voting for either of them
2006-10-29 09:52:24 · answer #11 · answered by traxx10 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋