English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

now every city you find big-gig malls people enjoying all this but what happened about little shopkipper......

2006-10-27 06:13:55 · 12 answers · asked by sandip p. 1 in Social Science Economics

12 answers

That is a two sided coin. There are two goals in economics. First, we want to achieve economies of scale meaning that companies are large enough so that they do not face the inefficiencies of smaller companies. Bigger companies have more resources than smaller ones. The other goal is competition. These goals seem to be at odds, but they are not. There is a balance that can be achieved. Take retail. The GAP, J. Crew, and Limited are all big companies with economies of scale, but they are highly competitive against one another. In other words, supermarkets are not bad as long as they are still subject to competition.

2006-10-27 07:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by jthomas1279 2 · 0 0

In the grand scheme of shopping, even ancient merchants understood the need to combine their efforts and form a public center devoted to buying and selling. Our modern malls and supermarkets are simply the modern incarnation of the bazaars of ancient days. Every hamlet used to to have a centralized location for buying and selling.

Our post WWII economy has put the deciding factors in the hands of the consumers: the more we buy, the better the economy. Malls help to achieve that directive.

Culturally speaking the mall, which was originally designed to get product to the masses, has helped to detiorate our choices. The Gap, J-Crew, Abercrombie and Fitch all sell similar products. Those who shop solely at the local mall will all dress the same, smell the same, have the same designer cell phones, eat the same cinnabon, etc. But as long as we buy, we survive.

2006-10-27 08:58:47 · answer #2 · answered by Maddog Salamander 5 · 0 0

Just like you close your small store and work for Walmart.And get minimum wages.Is very confinient until you realize you don,t have enough money to spend there.Then when they said can't make profit the just say we close our branch.And voila jobless.
That's exactly what happen every where.
All you need is a join partnership market not Supermarket.

2006-10-27 13:10:42 · answer #3 · answered by It's Me! 5 · 0 0

The little Mom and Pop stores cant compete with the big discount stores, so they close one by one. Want to help? Buy from the small guy, even if you have to pay a little more.

2006-10-31 04:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by P-Nut 7 · 0 0

Did you certainly examine what you published? those are conservative information components. "including interior the fees of "privately funded" balls for the time of inauguration week brings the full to almost $one hundred sixty million, in accordance to the enormous apple daily information. " those 'privately funded' balls are no longer respected Inaugural Balls and are not being paid for via the money the Obama team has raised. those balls are being placed on, and paid for, via private persons and firms with 'invitation purely' visitor lists. there have been those comparable style of balls for the time of Bush's 2 inaugural circumstances. the money they fees weren't quoted as area of the fees for the Bush respected balls. the sole reason they're being quoted now, for the time of Obama's inaugural balls, is to make Obama seem undesirable. And, extremely some the organizers of those 'private' balls have already stated that they are going to be giving the money raised via those balls to charity. As for the respected Inaugural Ball. Obama's team estimates its activities will value $40 5 million it extremely is fairly better than President George W. Bush's 2d-term inaugural in 2004. which will pay for many each and every thing different than protection and the extremely swearing-in ceremonies on the Capitol.

2016-11-25 23:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not at all.
More over it is a boon to us as we get to c all the varied trends around the globe at one place without investing much of time.This will also surely enhance our economy in all the ways inturn.

2006-10-27 20:31:57 · answer #6 · answered by ChanIndian 4 · 0 0

It is going to be disaster for small shopkeepers in India,but it is good for rich countries because here we believe in very rich people or very poor working class.

2006-10-27 14:27:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO WAY, WHEN THE DEMAND FOR THE PRODUCTS RISING
THEN ONLY THE BIG MALL INCREASES THE SELING PRICES
WHEN WE BRING THE VAT SYSTEM IT WILL NEVER AFFECT OUR ECONOMY
IT GIVE MORE INCOME TO GOVT
AND WELFARE TO PEOPLE

2006-10-27 17:33:59 · answer #8 · answered by an indian 2 · 0 0

Poor Gandhi, died invain, advocating Khadi and Swadeshi!

2006-10-27 14:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by Truth ? 5 · 0 0

no it is not harm for economy but it is harm to little shops and businesses

2006-10-27 20:58:46 · answer #10 · answered by sweettheif_420 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers