I gotta believe because hope is all that we Tigers fans have.
Hopefully Jim Leyland goes over the Tom Emansky Defensive Drills video with Verlander and the rest of the bully today.
Even if the Tigers can't pull it off, thanks to the Tigers for finally giving us a summer of baseball and congrats to the Cards on getting the clutch hits.
I hate it when people say the better team didn't win and if the Cardinals win the WS, they will have proven they are the better team. I just don't believe it will be happening.
2006-10-27
04:52:09
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Mike Oxmahl
4
in
Sports
➔ Baseball
The better team ALWAYS wins in the playoffs. ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS!!!!
The same people that do not think the better team ALWAYS wins probably believe the Lakers were the better TEAM in '04 when they lost to the Pistons, or that the Rams in SB XXXVI were better then the Patriots.
THE BETTER TEAM ALWAYS WINS!!!!!!
Now, the team with better TALENT may lose in the playoffs, but better talent does not make a group of players the better TEAM.
If that were the case, the NYY would win about 130 games every year followed by Boston then the White Sox.
I am so utterly fed up with people not understanding that a team is not made up of only individual talent, but how that talent works together.
Do you think a team with 25 players that are like Barry Bonds or T.O. would succeed? NO. They may have more talent, but they would lack character and chemistry
2006-10-27
06:15:43 ·
update #1
the better TEAM always wins. AGAIN, let me restate my points since you seemingly don't understand reasoning!!!!!!
Being a TEAM is not about having the most talent. It is preparation, chemistry, positive roll, negative role, talent, injuries, home field advantage, midst of a road trip, believing hype, underdog status, and a number of other things that place in to which team will win.
You proved your own point by basically stating "Any Given Sunday." Any given Sunday, a team with lesser talent can beat a team with better talent because the team with lesser talent comes out more prepared, hungrier for a win then the team with the lesser talent. It is an upset because the team with the better talent should be better, but it doesnt guarantee they will.
Why are so few unable to differentiate the two?
By your standards, Indy should have rolled through the playoffs the last 3 years, but they were not the better team because they weren't as prepared as the team that beat them!
2006-10-27
12:44:52 ·
update #2