Without voter fraud, some say the Democrats have a shot at getting power back in both the House and the Senate. Suppose they are right? How many think this would really make a difference? ....that any of the present administration's "irons in the fire" would be derailed?
Would you say that the present polling data reflects (A) a distrust in the evidence of a cover-up surrounding 9-11? (B) the Iraq war mess which now appears out of control despite the positive inroads made to lead this country into the 21st century? (c) This administrations efforts to derail Constitutional restraints by joining this nation with the Mexican and Canadian governments to form a mass economic trade alliance in an effort to remain competitive in the world of free trade? (D) this administrations efforts to reduce the Constitution to a null and void document with out the willing consent of both the House and the Senate or a majority count of 2/3 vote on same? (E) All of the above?
2006-10-27 04:50:38 · 11 answers · asked by jeeveswantstoknow 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
E. No doubt.
2006-11-01 05:43:18 · answer #1 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as the way the government is run i.e. non-accountability at every level. Our bills are a hajpaj of unrelated items, where many bad ideas are pasted just to get 1 or 2 good ones thru.
Have every item stand on its own merit. Make our politicians run on their verifiable record!
2006-11-03 11:33:00 · answer #2 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I generally try to vote against long-term (meaning more than one term) incumbents. If they haven't "fixed" it by now they are not going to. Give the next guy a chance. I would vote for term limits on Congress for this very reason.
I also have to pick (F) - none of the above.
2006-11-03 11:44:16 · answer #3 · answered by SevenZulu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why discount voter fraud since it is apparently a tool needed by the Dem's ..and their "helpful "get out the vote "Acorn organization" that was just busted with thousands of fake ballots.
Maybe they learned from the mob who still have the dead voting in Chicago.
A organization or political party that is obsessed with "their way or the highway attitude" is not a "Democratic political party" ..it is more of a strong arm organization
2006-11-02 13:34:22 · answer #4 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All of the above and more. I have decided to not vote for any incumbent regardless of party affiliation. It should be very clear by now the longer a person stays in Congress the more corrupt they become, in general. Joel Hefley of Colorado is a great exception...shame his fellow republicans set him up by putting him on the house ethics committee. He did his job and brought Tom Delay down...and now he is retiring due to their coercion.
2006-10-29 12:03:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll have to opt to say it is F) None of the above.
2006-11-02 16:04:48 · answer #6 · answered by Maverick 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I certainly hope that most of them are....
I know I am not voting for Feinstine.
2006-10-27 05:07:20 · answer #7 · answered by j H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i never though lieberman was going to get booted out by his party but i guess anything is possible.
2006-10-27 04:54:12 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope not...well, at least I hope the repub. incumbents won't.
2006-11-03 12:58:25 · answer #9 · answered by right_wing_extremist_2008 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I certainly hope so!
2006-11-01 01:38:58 · answer #10 · answered by Terry W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋