English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When we look at all the violation this party has allowed to happen:
Violation of the constitution
Human rights violations
Spying on it's own people
Wars for profit
etc. etc.

Shouldn't this party be dropped like slavery once was? Does it still have the right to be an organization? Should it's members and supporters be arrested and sentenced?

2006-10-27 04:01:10 · 19 answers · asked by Peter P 1 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

The republicans are an abomination of politics. They mistake a political mindset with blind following. The republican party is nothing but a collective of hate, greed and lawlessness. They have abandoned God and religion and replaced it with oil and greed. The golden calf that the Jews used to dance around has been replaced by the oil in the ground. They would sell their mothers and fathers in order to make a shiny penny.

2006-10-27 04:02:05 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 4 7

Peter, let me ask you, SHOULD THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BE DISBANDED AND DISALLOWED?

When we look at the violation this party has allowed to happen:
Violations of the constitution
Human rights violations
Steeling from its own people
Anything for profit
Legalized murder of unborn children
Treason
Obstructing National Security
Hypocritical values
Same Sex Marriage advocates
etc., etc, (and I'll bet that you cannot elaborate in detail on any of the charges you have alleged, as I can and will on my list if you do on yours)

Shouldn't this party be dropped like slavery once was? Does it still have the right to be an organization? Should its members and supporters be arrested and sentenced? Are you one of those fanatical ultra liberal Bush bashing Democrats? I thought so!

The truth is that any political party has an agenda and a set of basic beliefs that they advocate more than another. Also any political party is as corrupt as the people in power within it. There are exceptions to the rule in any political party because there are liberal Democrats and liberal Republicans, moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans, and conservative Democrats and conservative Republicans. Clinton is an ultra liberal Democrat pretending to be moderate. Bush is an honest conservative Republican. McCain is an honest moderate Republican. Joe Lieberman is an honest conservative Democrat. I could go on and on but you should be able to get the picture.

2006-10-27 11:40:43 · answer #2 · answered by cnsrvtvbabe 1 · 3 0

What country are you living in? Remember freedom of expression? Since when can a party be banned?

I think Bush and co. are the worst thing that has happened to the US since... well, before Nixon at least, but if people start talking like this question even worse things can happen.

For any legal issues by all means go for them - they certainly had no compunctions about stalling the country for 8 years by tying up Clinton's time with ridiculous accusations (even if true, which they probably are, they were not impeachable, and the result was to half paralyze the government for 8 years - which is what the Repubs wanted anyway.)

If you want to do something get out and work for the Democrats (but for my sake, please not Hillary), but learn something about how our government works before destroying it, please.

2006-10-27 11:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by sofarsogood 5 · 0 0

Thanks for displaying so aptly the hypocrisy of the left. We don't agree with your opinions so you must be disbanded. Why? Because enlightened liberals deem it to be necessary. Not to mention we would win all the elections because there would be no competition. Why not just skip all the fracas, go the extra mile and declare America a communist state with a liberal proletariat in control.

Please provide evidence of your indictments.

What violation of the constitution? Are you talking about not extending the rights of American citizens to enemy combatants actively engaged in a war against American Forces?

What human rights violations? Are you talking about making those same enemy combatants pile up in a human pyramid, wear panties on their head and listen to loud music. Sound like Frat night at the local college to me.

What spying on it's own people? Are you talking about monitoring communications between possible terrorist handlers and their cells in America in order to prevent future attack against American citizens.

What war for profit? Are you talking about oil in Iraq. If so, where is all this oil were supposed to be stealing?

2006-10-27 11:16:20 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan 7 · 3 0

Do away with the two party dominated system completly. Get voices for the average american back into politics again. This of course would involve third and forth parties to be involved. Make it where you didn't have to be a millionare to be a political canidate, and create fisical guide lines that all parties were subjected to.

2006-10-27 11:07:41 · answer #5 · answered by drighten_mo 2 · 0 0

What a childish question. What are you? 13?

1) No violations of the constitution. Saying it over and over does not make it truth.
2) Human rights violations? Where? No violations of Geneva convention with non-country sponsored non-uniformed combatants known as terrorists.
3) Umm... look back thru history at the history of communications interception of the ENEMY. Name one time with the 'new focus' on this that the government has used intercepted TERRORIST conversations to issue so much as a parking ticket against a US citizen. I DARE YOU
4) Where is the profit? Where is this supposed cheap and free oil? Where is the vast amounts of oil from Iraq? Quite simply this is another liberal lie.
5) Name the etceteras.... I'm waiting... because they will be just as false and laughable

Go back to class and stop using your middle school's study hall computer to ask ignorant pseudo-questions

2006-10-27 11:07:10 · answer #6 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 3 1

Isn't this question stifling freedom of speech?
People have a right to be a Republican, just as they have a right to be a Democrat.
I think with all the crap that BOTH parties have put us through, BOTH should be disbanded and disallowed. Be fair.

2006-10-27 11:05:40 · answer #7 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 1

As a liberal who most often votes Democrat I would have to say no. The biggest problem we have now is the lack of any real debate of ideas. This president has immersed himself in an atmosphere of inbred thinking. All around him, as well as the congressional leadership have closed themselves off from fresh ideas.

During the war FDR appointed some conservative and Republicans to advisory positions (including a cabinet member) because he wanted to hear and be able to evaluate a wide range of ideas. this strengthened his ability to lead.

I believe we need both liberals and conservatives involved in governing this country. It has to be both though. Having just one or the other weakens us.

2006-10-27 11:07:35 · answer #8 · answered by toff 6 · 1 0

How about the Republicans and Democrats just become one party (there both the same crap anyway) and then finally we can allow other more intelligent parties to actually enter the elections and debate issues.

2006-10-27 11:03:41 · answer #9 · answered by Autogestion 3 · 2 0

Only if we disband the Dems for their history of slavery, lynching, corruption, murder, extortion, segregation, wars for profit, spying on our own people, human rights violations, constitutional violations.

WHy should you have to succeed in the marketplace of ideas when you can just arrest and prosecute those who disagree with you, right?

2006-10-27 11:05:27 · answer #10 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 4 1

Wow, did I miss something? When did we turn into a dictatorship? Get real and open your eyes. It isn't just "Republican's" doing those things. And slavery wasn't "dropped", there was a war fought over it.

2006-10-27 11:18:28 · answer #11 · answered by Sheila V 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers