2006-10-27 03:20:58 · 7 answers · asked by Rhyan S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
PLEASE SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER WITH WHY OR WHY NOT......!!!!!
2006-10-27 03:28:21 · update #1
they should but they won't because they'll have to curtail their lavish energy wasting lifestyles. who needs electric toothbrushes?
2006-10-27 03:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course we should. For moral and financial reasons we shouldn't set ourselves apart from the rest of the world. We may wish to lead now, but there will be other areas in which we would be smarter to take a secondary position, like North Korea and the Middle East. Terrorism will eventually be fought country to country and we cannot enter and fight at will into another country, we have seen what happens with that.
2006-10-27 10:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if we want to win the war on terror. In order to prevent future attacks, we need quality and timely intelligence information. If we have no friends and don’t play well with others, they have no reason or obligation to play well with us. We may be stronger than any other nation, but we are not stronger that all other nations.
2006-10-27 10:40:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think the US should work unilaterally with the rest of the world.
2006-10-27 10:24:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Might help the Plight of America if it did!
But I feel there are too many obstacles in the way of this possibility ever becoming reality!
2006-10-27 10:23:24 · answer #5 · answered by J. Charles 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. We should follow Bush's foreign admin policy even if that means resulting in a nuclear holocaust
2006-10-27 10:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-10-27 10:22:43 · answer #7 · answered by Jibba Jabba 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋