A common expression to justify abortion is that the mother has the right to choose to abort the baby because it is her body.
However, the baby inside is seperate and distinct from the mother's body. It is a seperate life form.
The baby is in the mother's womb because that is where it needs to be to grow into a human capable of living outside the womb.
Until that time, the baby requires nourishment from the mother. Therefore, it is the mother's responsibility to provide it with nourishment.
Therefore, abortion terminates a seperate and distinct life and is a rejection of the mother's responsibility.
Does that series of ideas make logical sense? Why or why not?
2006-10-27 02:55:04 · 13 answers · asked by Drowningbluestars 4 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
Yes it does make sense. I can understand your train of thought. And we probably should all keep in mind that it's still a life that didn't ask to be there.
2006-10-27 02:57:38 · answer #1 · answered by brown_iyed_grrl 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the international isn't over populated. there is lots room interior the international and a super form of persons die daily so it evens out. Abortion IS homicide that's an alive person, with a beating heart, created via God. God would not want human beings to "deliver Him infants swifter." He gave us infants, and to no longer be killed previously beginning. What if the aborted toddler grows as much as discover a therapy for many cancers or do different good issues? properly, you blew it via murdering it. super interest. merely have the toddler and placed it up for adoption rather of killing it. What in case you made something astonishing and somebody did no longer choose for it so as that they destroyed it? many ladies who've abortions journey rigidity and melancholy. don't have ABORTIONS!!!!!!
2016-11-25 23:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could never really classify it either way. If it saves the mother's life, is it still "bad"? If the baby was going to be born without a brain (and this does happen) is it still "bad"? If the mother was going to have the kid, neglect it, or abuse it would it really be better to have the child? Everyone is going to say, well, what about adoption? But many women would never consider that.
2006-10-27 03:14:29 · answer #3 · answered by Christabelle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not logical. Why? It assumes that the woman has no right to bodily autonomy. It assumes that she has no rights to say 'no you can't use my body'.
Why do you assume that it is her responsibility to feed the 'baby'? It's not her responsibility. Just as it's not your responsibility to give one of your kidneys away because some guy is out there dying because he can't get a transplant from anyone else. It's your choice to save that man or not just as it's her choice not to have a child if that's what she wants.
Besides, your ignoring the womans psychological, social and emotional well being. Her quality of life may be more important than a potentials right to life.
2006-10-27 18:01:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does the embryo have any developed thought processes? No, therefor it is unable to make any decisions on it's right to live or die. The choice must be that of the mothers and it is up to her to make a considered decision based on her needs and beleifs.
2006-10-27 03:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by mark_virgin 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Every woman has a choice, and I think if she chooses to abort her baby, then she is choosing not take responsibility for the choosing to have sex, she is taking a human life and choosing for the baby that the baby will not live.
The womb is the protection that a woman has in her that protects the baby until the baby is born, this is where the baby learns her/his mothers voice, learns to love his mother, this is where the mother learns to love her baby...
Pregnancy can be hard, but it is a beautiful thing.
Just like sex, sex is a beautiful thing, but if you abuse sex by not taking in the full extent of what it is about, then you shouldn't be having sex!
2006-10-27 03:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by mrs. ruspee 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Complete sence, I love the answer the 1st person gave. I really can't believe the embro vs. baby logic. I had a ultrasound at 5 weeks w/ my son he was so cute (saw heartbeat) he looked like a alien , but cute! God gave me a child to care for inutero & out & I would never betray
2006-10-27 02:59:06 · answer #7 · answered by notAminiVANmama 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It absolutly makes sense. What about the rights of the baby? I believe the baby has the right to live. God says that he knows us in the womb, wich tells me that the unborn baby has a soal. It is a human and I don't think anyone has the right to take another innocent human life.
2006-10-27 02:58:08 · answer #8 · answered by #3ontheway! 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It's a theory, they don't come in good or bad, they just are. But, everyone has the right to choose between good and bad. I choose everyday whether or not to go out and kill people. The real question is what if the dad wants the baby, and the mom wants to terminate the pregnancy?
2006-10-27 02:59:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Most women abort an embryo..not a baby. I am in favor of a woman to choose as long as it is done early enough. If a woman waits too long, that is pure irresponsibility.
2006-10-27 02:59:27 · answer #10 · answered by KathyS 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋