like anjolina jolie who has adopted three babys from the same country.
2006-10-27 01:23:42 · 7 answers · asked by nicole s 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
this is a good point..well have you notice that all celebrity are doing in Africa...and have stay out there weeks ..maybe because they getting special Property Values on vacation homes...we need Americans to help Americans here..New Orleans...Proferty....Children in need here St Jude's Hospital needs help...saving our Children
2006-10-27 01:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by babo1dm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a matter of who like you. If you are a media darling you can do almost anything. Madonna has been a figure of controversy for years. Angelina is still arising star. I guess that matters to some people (shrug)
What I want to know is why people feel they have to go to a different country to make a difference when adopting a child. There are thousands of children in just the U.S. that Angelina could have adopted, who would have loved to have a loving family.
2006-10-27 01:31:23 · answer #2 · answered by Black Dragon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i have a problem with celebrities adopting out of this country when there are plenty of homeless children here that would love good homes,i guess american children aren't good enough for them,(I'm in no way saying foreign children aren't worth adoption either)adoption of foreign children is usually from dirt poor,i mean dirt poor families, i see that as an insult,"you are poor,I'm taking your child now" is what comes to mind.it is vain and a publicity move if you ask me.celebrities having babies in resorts in poor countries,that's it,preach for help for these countries while you stay in the richest part,or the most livable,and have your baby while the same people you claim to want to help are still starving while you have your baby ,that shows what kind of person you are.celebrities need to get over themselves and start touring orphaninges in this country for once.
2006-10-27 01:34:36 · answer #3 · answered by jen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's actually wonderful that she's doing this ,but she already stands condemned by small minded moralists and fudamentalists of all religions and philosopies who feel that her brave actions as an agent of change give them the right to diss(cast the first stone) her and bring her down a notch or two sO SHE MIGHT BECOME HARMFUL BIGOTS LIKE THEM. yOU GO GET'M LADY this ole rebel respects you as the guttiest woman of our generation. gloria steinem might be your Gaurdian angel Love " kisses
Pancho from the village
2006-10-27 01:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by ancientcityentertainment 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think that her adopting the child is the issue. The issue is that the father of the child wants him back.
2006-10-27 01:26:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because the father is still ALIVE.
the media has poisoned his brain about the adoption. at first he was saying he didn't want him just to have to burry him like he did his wife and other children.
2006-10-27 01:29:49 · answer #6 · answered by craina c 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
show off
2006-10-27 01:25:50 · answer #7 · answered by george p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋