i'm not against it at all it makes s.e.x much more pleasurable for us girls that is
2006-10-27 00:36:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by missree 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
What did Jesus' circumcision have to do with it? He said specifically that it was no longer necessary!
People are opposed to this barbaric practice because it removes a healthy and functional body part for no good reason. The hygiene and disease arguments for it are just untrue and have repeatedly been shown to be totally unfounded.
Circumcision cuts down on sexual enjoyment for both the man and his partner. There can be serious complications, including having to amputate the whole penis! And for what? So some shallow twit can think it looks cuter? Get real - this is something that should never be done to a healthy boy - they are born perfect and should be allowed to remain that way. Yes, I've heard porn stars are usually cut and shaved and otherwise made into caricatures of a real man, but that's a pretty sick role model to follow!
2006-10-28 11:39:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Maple 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
First of all Jesus was born a Jew and was circumcised as an infant 8 days old, IT WAS NOT HIS CHOICE TO BE CIRCUMCISED!
Just like it is not the choice of baby boys to be circumcised now! It is done to them!
It is interesting how you site Jesus and porn as examples of why boys should be mutilated! What version of the Bible do you read? Or where do you get your porn?
Actually the reasons for the porn stars appearing cut is that the age group that most would have to be in were from a time when over 90 percent of baby boys were circumcised, for one, and for another, most penises would be shown erect in pornography and when erect it is hard to tell if they are uncircumcised.
Perhaps another reason is maybe the uncircumcised guys are so satisfied with the sex they get in their relationships that they don't feel the need to "screw around" in porn flicks.
Circumcision removes most of the actual sensation in the penis. Many circumcised men find it very difficult to orgasm from vaginal intercourse, and when they do, the orgasm is not as intense. Most circumcised males are able to function, to some extent, because it is hard wired into a male to enjoy sex and he may use visual sensations, or fantasy to replace the sensations that are lost with the 240 feet of nerves and 20,000 nerve endings removed by circumcision. This will makes males more open to looking around and wandering if they cannot find the stimulus they need at home. So if your titties start to sag or those couple of extra pounds settle on your ***, he may have to start looking around to find the fuel for his fire.
Women are always saying that men think with their penises; this might just be the case especially for circumcised guys. I would much rather think with the big head and feel with the little one, but since I am circumcised, the little head doesn't feel much so the big head has to do the feeling and the penis has to take over the thinking.
As for your husband, I hope you and he have a good marriage and enjoy your sex lives together; but you had best keep up the Kiegel exercises to stay tight "down there" so he can actually feel something.
2006-10-29 03:54:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Why are you trying to justify circumcision on the fact that some bloke was circumcised 2000 years ago??
We have moved on a bit since then.
Routine circumcision of boys is a barbaric act and serves no useful purpose.All the old arguments about it is cleaner, and prevents diseases are rubbish. If you dont wash it, it gets dirty, cut or uncut!
If a man wants to be circumcised then that is his decision to make when he is old enough. Routine circumcision of boys is a violation of a perfectly healthy body and should be stopped.
If female circumcision was routinely carried out at birth in the west (as it is in some countries) there would be a huge outcry!!!
2006-10-27 00:47:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fluffy 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
Well I think its cruel. Im not circumcised and if we have a little piece of skin there is because we should its not there to take it out and also if you are going to circumcise a baby be sure to ask him first if he would like to, uhmm you can't well dont do it, Just because they are babys and they can't comunicate it doesn't mean it doesn't hurt.
2006-10-27 00:48:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
I don't think it's Circumcision per se that is objectionable, but infant circumcision for religious reasons. To mutilate a child for no medical reason , merely because some bronze-age myth commanded it, it wrong, full stop.
2006-10-27 00:36:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Avondrow 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
Nothing - it is just a pet program being promoted by some people. It is cleaner and there will be less problems for a guy later
2006-10-27 03:08:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by bad_bob_69 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I don't think people are against it, most men have been circumcised. I don't know where you got your information but I've never heard anyone say anything against it.
2006-10-27 02:35:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by vanhammer 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
it depend on the man/women. some women likes men that is not Circumcision. because the sex last much longer then the circumcision ones. .
2006-10-27 00:40:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by dmncprkr 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
circumcision in my opinon and expereance is the best it's clean for one thing, being honest the men that i have been with that are un circmusised all have a sligh odor about them but my partner who has been circumsised is perfectly clean. xx
2006-10-27 00:57:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dreamah 3
·
5⤊
5⤋
The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$
MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!
In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/
HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.
MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.
SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!
If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html
2006-10-28 23:20:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by miniboi6666 2
·
1⤊
4⤋