HULL
2006-10-26 22:27:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by dec g 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
The list was published at the weekend on the Sky News Website.
Hackney cames first as the worst place, Hull was last years worst place, this year it wasn't even in the top ten worst places.
-----
CE: Doncaster is a fantastic place to live - come and spend a week here, enjoy our ecomony, culture and hospitality.
-----
Here are the results for the worst places to live:
1. Hackney, east London
2. Tower Hamlets, east London
3. Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales
4. Newham, east London
5. Islington, north London
6. Middlesbrough, North East
7. City of Nottingham, East Midlands
8. Strabane, County Tyrone, Northern Ireland
9. Blaenau Gwent, south Wales
10. Manchester, North West
The link to the Sky News article is below:
2006-10-26 22:42:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by thebigtombs 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hackney was voted the worst and I think this is unfair. I lived in Hackney for a couple of years, on the 9th floor of a council flat and actually I really enjoyed living there. The place is edgy, vibrant, diverse and exciting.... 10 times better than when I lived in Winchester, which was voted the best on last nights programme!!!
2006-10-26 22:35:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hackney
2006-10-26 22:36:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lynbow 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hackney
2006-10-26 22:35:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by richard_beckham2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They said on the radio this morning that Hackney was the worst town, but i didnt see the programme so not sure if thats true or not
2006-10-26 22:28:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by heleneaustin 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Looking at that list I see that 4 of the top 5 are in london. That figures, I always knew it was a $hit hole!
Middlesbrough is quite high up though, it's the closest big town to me and I can only agree it's a dump.
2006-10-26 23:58:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by PETER F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hackney!! God there was some dives on that program!!! Quite suprised to see Tunbridge wells as number three in the nice places. Thats just next door to me!
2006-10-26 22:30:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I managed to computer screen the entire programme and that i did locate it insightful, in spite of the indisputable fact that the Imam (religious chief) did state that it became not Islam that lead those women human beings to be poorly dealt with by technique of their husbands, yet their own subculture that that they had further with them to the united kingdom. The programme placed for the era of a aspect of view that Muslim marriages are undesirable, yet it really is only a minority as a majority of Muslim marriages are effective, wherein many ladies everyone is chuffed, have equivalent rights, and revered by technique of their husbands and their households. This programme did not teach a balanced view, and easily a minority of guys are married to larger than one woman less than Shariah (in spite of the indisputable fact that the husbands ought to attend to each and each and every woman particularly). it is a good party of how the Media portrays different cultures, which ends up in unfavourable stereotypes, subsequently as a society we want to coach ourselves on those concerns and not in any respect anticipate that actuality is in accordance to a documentary.
2016-12-05 06:57:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hackney - it aint a town though is a borough of London
2006-10-26 22:27:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Andy M Thompson 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hull was LAST year, it wasn't even in the top ten worst this year.
2006-10-26 23:43:39
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋