English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a. Lower-income children
b. Middle-income children
c. Higher-income children
d. No difference

Note: if you look at my other questions you will find similar easy survey questions. I'd be appreciative if those who answer this one would follow up and answer some of the others.

2006-10-26 18:08:49 · 9 answers · asked by Ekaj321 3 in Education & Reference Primary & Secondary Education

9 answers

my guess would be
Middle-income BOYS

2006-10-27 04:26:15 · answer #1 · answered by Zippy 7 · 0 0

C. I would assume higher income children only because they are more likely to have good health care coverage. Lower income kids are more likely to have either no coverage or a state funded plan. Of course you can get a referral to a psychologist with a state funded health plan, but good luck actually getting in for an assessment, by the time the childs name comes up on the waiting list s/he'll be a senior citizen.

2006-10-26 18:33:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lower-income MALE children

2006-10-26 18:11:00 · answer #3 · answered by kimnwi 3 · 0 0

D. No Difference.

They weren't so kind about lables in the schools I went to,.. if you caused problems in any way or were abnormal in anyway you were labled the same (not ADHD)... and they come up with any excuse to try to get all parents to have their kids on Ritilin.

Although Each Income Level has a tendency to gain that lable a certain way (so to say it's commonly the lable is given with this level or type of person because... -insert here-). Different types of people are labled differently. For example some High Schools will have their Sports Players try to get labled ADHD as an excuse for grades and to help get out of classwork,.. although the normal ADHD student in that school might get MORE homework & classwork to train their brain to pick up on things.. the Team Members some how got out of work... plus an automatic out of percentage of class work for being in sports from certain teahcers. This means even if they never do so much as to write their name on papers and nothing else, they still get passed by teachers for combos of these things.

2006-10-26 18:24:06 · answer #4 · answered by sailortinkitty 6 · 0 0

B.
Lower income most likely not to be diagnosed at all.
Higher-income most likely to get further testing and other diagnoses.

2006-10-26 18:20:11 · answer #5 · answered by LAUGHING MAGPIE 6 · 0 0

Boys

2006-10-26 18:16:30 · answer #6 · answered by Sydney 4 · 0 1

D: No Difference

2006-10-26 18:11:37 · answer #7 · answered by harleymeemee 1 · 0 0

Sociologically speaking, boys are better in all likelihood to be seen via instructors (who spend all day with pupils of diagnosing age) as complicated than women human beings. this might desire to be by potential of way of distinctive themes, self relaxing prophecy, college subcultures and so on. The media represents boys as better socially rebellious, quite some assume them to act as a effect. So a boys rebellious or socially unacceptable behaviour is in all likelihood to be much less tolerated for a shorter volume of time, and adults and specialists alike are better vulnerable to at as at as quickly as as leap to a analysis of ADHD for boys through fact it extremely is standard. a woman who did the same concern might desire to be better in all likelihood to be clinically determined with a depressive ailment and given verbal medical care. All sociological. -EDIT- Ahhh thats a sturdy question. of course it extremely is all my opinion - I quite have close journey in the two the psychological wellbeing and sociological factors. i think of of the performed diagnosing little ones is a stable distance overused - particularly i'm unhappy to assert in western cultures, i.e. the united kingdom and the country. the 1st step is to get rid of the media's disruptive enter and to resign it represnting boys in this way, by potential of way of actuality as at as quickly as through fact the media has ceased to have it extremely is say then it supplies you up influencing attitudes and comments of experts. i'm now no longer maintaining specialists are thoroughly inspired and unprofessional! of course now no longer! inspite of if the media's impact is astonishing in all factors of lifestyles. inspite of if the media shedding has a narrow possibility - so extremely i might desire to assert i'm uncertain the thank you to MHP (psychological wellbeing specialists) sould suggestions-set it. With a extremely better open suggestions and pills locked away, i might desire to assert. quite my opinion and none stated to annoy. thank you on your question :)

2016-12-28 06:03:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

D

2006-10-26 18:12:26 · answer #9 · answered by lucy02 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers