655,000 dead!
Bush: Job well done!
2006-10-26 17:12:35 · 14 answers · asked by freetinka 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First you prove to me that it was illegal? Huh? What international law are you using to back your reasoning?
2006-10-26 17:42:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Where are they running to? I agree that Bush went into Iraq and truly was not right for doing it, however, he may be the wisest president ever if we end up in Iraq permanently. I've been saying all along that if we had bases in Iraq permanently after Iraq has it's own sovereign government; we would be a threat to all the crazies in the area and they would think twice before doing anything stupid. For the first time publicly, Bush actually said that was a possibility; if Iraq wants us there. This may actually stabilize the Middle East region like our troops did in Germany in World War II. Just think of that! But, the only way is to stay and get things fair to all the people of that country...except the killing terrorists(those thug gang members like Bin Ladin and his followers) who want nothing but death, terror and destruction for anyone and everyone. By the way, many of the deaths in Iraq are also by other Middle Eastern peoples. You know, the ones that blow up buses with Iraqi people on board and blow of car bombs and road side bombs. If we wanted to go in and kill all these Iraqi people, we could have just nuked them and been done.
2006-10-27 00:27:47 · answer #2 · answered by hearts_and_thoughts_2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though the americans started the Iraqi thing, it is up to the Iraqis to stand up. Unfortunately the terrorists in Iraq are not even Iraqie. And now secular fighting. So when Iraqi's stand up as well, like I said at the beginning if america just occupied Iraq as some said they did, then this problem wouldn't be here today. It is because the tried not to do it by occupying is it what is causing the problem today.
2006-10-27 00:36:07 · answer #3 · answered by tordor111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok so I see the number keeps changing. Running away? How can you construe this? The war is not illegal as you spew so go back to watching Nickelodeon because that seems to be more the speed of your politics. Cartoon Network might be showing Scooby Doo and you could solve the mystery before those meddling kids if you try hard enough.
2006-10-27 00:24:55 · answer #4 · answered by Jim from the Midwest 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one is running away---not America's style But there is now a elected by the Iraqi Govt there and it needs to act like it-disarm the milita, start enforcing laws- and the Iraqi are killing m,ore and more of their own and still Our soldiers-this month one of the worst of which there has to be a ending to for its lives lost with no accomplishment to justify the loss. And again a American soldier captured by Iraqi's in Baghdad is unknown. I agree the war was illegal but in the process Iraqis were released from the tyranny of Sadaam and given the opportunity to begin governing themselves and whats up in the air is are they capable for not doing it yet and why now being pressured to start
2006-10-27 00:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the American way.
Global Domination and the New World Order. Still not as bad as the 2 million Vietnamese that the Americans killed.
God Bless those that deserve his blessing.
2006-10-27 00:20:14 · answer #6 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) Your casuality # is imaginary.
2) The war is not illegal.
3) We aren't running anywhere.
There I answered even though you didn't ask a question.
2006-10-27 01:27:35 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they are running away! Bush is too arrogant to admit defeat, he rather waste the live of his citizen to support his ego! But hey, who could argue it is the Americans who are dying, since they continue to support Bush. Who knows a weakened US might be a good thing for us who wish to live in peace!
2006-10-27 00:19:13 · answer #8 · answered by Zal I 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
Remember the President cannot make this decision without congress. There is a lot of blame to spread around.
2006-10-27 00:16:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LMAO, dont forget about the many democrats that spoke out in favor of the war, before they didnt of course....
2006-10-27 00:17:11 · answer #10 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋