English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was Bush who was behind it Bush is trying to do an inside job
He is evil I tell you
I have nothing against Bush But I have to speak the truth
He is blinding you when ill you see the truthed is right on your eyes
Do you agree
Bush will take us to Hell for his mistakes he does bad and then put the America ppl in it without then knowing
Do you want to go to hell

I don't think so

Do you agrree with me

I thought so

2006-10-26 15:48:08 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

23 answers

I do agree. I think he should be impeached. Here is a link if you agree. He has also given himself the power to wiretap, search and detain any american without bringing charges against them. Money is the reason he would kill his own people.


http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geuo0udkFFRg8ArBBXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTFjM2NkMjdkBGNvbG8DZQRsA1dTMQRwb3MDMQRxdANkcQRzZWMDc3IEdnRpZANGODMxXzcy/SIG=11fr2vhc4/EXP=1162004398/**http%3a//www.impeachbush.org/

2006-10-26 16:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by chawk1760 2 · 3 5

I dont know how abstract concepts like God and hell got in here...........
the hard evidence is there for all who care to look.
1)read the entire 9/11 commission report
2)read the entire "the new pearl harbour" by Griffin
Compare and see for yourself.I f Bush wasnt at least aware of subversive activity from within then any cognitive or analytical or deductive skills I have are entirely false and I should just commit myself right now.
I didnt beleive it at first either but the evidence is there.
Disinformation by govt is as old as govt.It isnt so hard to accept that we have a corrupt system.
and for those who desire hard evidence take a look.IT is there too.Melted steel beams consistent with cuts made by set directional explosives .Those pics are easy to find.The damage to the towers was assymetrical and yet the 3 buildings all came down in a symmetrical fashion.I have never been able to find another example of this or find an explanation for it.AND I HAVE LOOKED BECAUSE I DIDNT WANT TO BELIEVE IT EITHER !!Eyewitness testimony from 100s of credible witnesses including firemen and the like.My goodness people have been hung for less.Just whta kind of evidence does it take?
the foundation of the towers was displaced outwards many metres.This became apparent only after the cleanup .A building falling straight down does not displace foundations sideways to that degree>Ask any engineer.Especially when these foundations are holding back TONS AND TONS OF WATER PRESSURE FROM THE RIVER!!
What is unfortunate is the tripe that some of these conspiracy theorists bring out.Like no plane hit the pentagon.Planes do disappear when they hit a concrete wall at high speed.Take a look at this link .It is the best presentation I have seen on the pentagon incident and for me it is sufficient proof that a plane hit the pentagon.http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg7
on it you will find a video of an f4 being crashed into a concrete wall.Notice how the plane turns into nothing.
Propaganda and counter propaganda have always been tools of govt.Why should modern govt be any different?Why should our govt be any different?
The physical eveidence is suufficient enough to prove complicity if not downright fault .The circumstantial evidence is completely overwhelming.How many days did Bush wait to launch an inquiry into 9/11.I believe it was 419 days.5 million dollars was awarded to the board.Clintons ******* was awarded $30 MILLION FREAKIN DOLLARS AND THE INQUIRY WAS LAUNCHED IN A VERY MUCH SHORTER TIME.Is that how America investigates attack from foreign nationals?

2006-10-27 09:18:49 · answer #2 · answered by Paul I 4 · 1 0

I think this can be summed up in a term I learned in Physics class... For every action there is an equal and OPPOSITE reaction. People will always dig deep and twist fact to change the outcome of a story. They will leave out "key" details that would in fact prove them wrong. (Like the theory that a cruise missle hit the pentegon due to the hole seemed too small for a plane crash. Yet FAILED to mention all the light poles that were ripped out or sheared off well beyond the width of a cruise missles wing span!) We are a sick race of sorts and want to beleive the terrible "hidden" truth rather than what our eyes and minds tell us. This sells books and magazine subscriptions so they will always do it.

2016-03-28 08:50:04 · answer #3 · answered by Donna 4 · 0 0

I definitely DO NOT agree with you. You think he is evil and attacked your country yet have nothing against him? You make about as much of an argument as a Democrat. All you Bush-haters think he is a moronic monkey, yet believe he is capable of planning a complex attack like 9/11, more democratic flip-flopping? Judging by your grammar and theories I am guessing you're in Middle School. You need to start thinking for yourself, instead of believing what is "cool".

2006-10-27 16:05:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Until you can show me some HARD evidence that your claims are true, I will have to believe what I saw that day.

In "hard evidence", I am speaking of documents, physical evidence. . . NOT blogs, websites, books and things written by those that share your point of view. This isn't evidence; it is just someone with a theory. It doesn't become fact until it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

PS - there are those that think Elvis still lives. . . And we never walked on the moon - that was also a government conspiracy.

fr_chuck: You speak the truth, sir. Maybe she will see it, but I doubt it.

2006-10-26 15:56:46 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2 2

To perform the conspiricy of 9/11 as the theorists describe would take someone both smart and extremely power-crazy who has no fear of the checks and balances within the system. After all, someone on the inside would talk eventually.
Bush may be many things, but I don't believe he or any other modern politician is capable of hatching such a plot.
I think it's time to drop this one.

2006-10-26 15:54:44 · answer #6 · answered by Bart S 7 · 3 2

There is no irrefutable evidence to prove that he was behind the attack. There is, however a whole list of facts that indicate that he had foreknowledge of the event.

My opinion is that he was happy to have this country attacked because the attack would be the impetus for him to go to war in countries that produce opium and oil, tow major moneymakers.

For the record, I do not believe Bush is smart enough to make these kinds of decisions. Bush is the frontman for group of decisionmakers, so he gets credited with the Administration's activities.

2006-10-26 16:00:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

I despise Bush but there is no way he is responsible for 9/11. You conspiracy nuts refuse to accept the facts. There are films showing exactly what happened and we know who plotted it and who took responsibility for it. But that still isn't enough for you crackpots.

2006-10-26 15:58:02 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 3 2

And as I was looking at those towers that were destroyed in Lebanon, it occurred to me that we have to punish the transgressor with the same, and that we had to destroy the towers in America, so that they taste what we tasted and they stop killing our women and children.
Videotape broadcast on al-Jazeera TV as reported by CNN (29 October 2004)

Every Muslim, from the moment they realize the distinction in their hearts, hates Americans, hates Jews and hates Christians. For as long as I can remember, I have felt tormented and at war, and have felt hatred and animosity for Americans.
As quoted in Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama bin Laden (2005) by Bruce Lawrence

2006-10-26 15:54:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

While I agree 911 was an obvious inside job, I don't think W. is bright enough to pull it off.

Google PNAC for your answer.

2006-10-26 15:55:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You must be "nucking futs".

I think you really need to see a psych tech and see if you can't place a 72 hr hold on yourself. Thoughts like that make me think you're unable to care for yourself.

2006-10-26 16:00:17 · answer #11 · answered by suk_on_my_glock 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers