The alternative seems to be for the U.S. to remain as "controllers" forever.
2006-10-26 14:57:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It depends on who wants it. If the Kurds, the Shiites or Sunni wish it than so be it otherwise The US should but out!
2006-10-26 15:52:07 · answer #1 · answered by lovetolearn 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they should be broken up into 3 countries, yes. The boundary lines for Iraq were arbitrarily drawn by the British early in the 20th century. They have never been a united country. Each "tribe" has loyalty to itself--not to the country of Iraq as a whole.
2006-10-26 22:06:58 · answer #2 · answered by catherine02116 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so - India was split into India and Pakistan by the British, and that's been nothing but trouble! Same with Iraq and Kuwait!
2006-10-26 22:06:58 · answer #3 · answered by rasmalai001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Turkey won't allow it
2006-10-27 01:57:27 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no Iran would just swallow them up, which it may do now anyway, curtesy of the stupid americans
2006-10-27 04:58:24 · answer #5 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
AND WHO DECIDES THAT?
2006-10-26 22:30:30 · answer #6 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋