Calling all 911 Conspiracy Theorists! I need your expert opinion!?

Question

Apply all of the following to both the WTC and the Pentagon. Just can't wait to hear your explanations:
All those people who saw the planes fly into the WTC and the Pentagon were hallucinating, was it just a David Copperfield trick? Then there's all the people killed on the airliners and the families who lost them, that's quite a trick to get all those people to disappear forever and they must have given acting lessons to the families they chose to support the conspiracy. Oh wait, let me guess, those people never existed to begin with right? "They" (whoever "they" are lol) contacted employers and asked them to falsify records to claim employees they never had, insurance companies paid on claims to families for people that never existed and all the cell phone companies falsified their records to fabricate the calls made to families and friends from the planes. Then there's the air traffic controllers who were tracking the planes, all in on it. Let's hear your explanations, can't wait

Okay, so far 2 conspiracy nuts and no answers to my points, just more ridiculous website referrals and some nut who claims the hijackers are still alive lol. Why no explanations for my points, I'm dying to know the answers, help me out here!

Hmm...lots of "don't believe everything the gov't says" and a correction on my use of the term conspiracy theorists. No explanations, it's so sad, I thought you all this so figured out.
BTW - I appreciate the word skeptic, but these nuts do fit the term conspiracy theorists, they believe this was all a conspiracy by our own gov't.

We may differ on political opinions sassi, but I am not joking. I am disgusted with these fools who keep claiming conspiracy. On this issue, we are on the same page, perhaps you should reread my question, it's very pointedly against them. I am very sorry you lost someone in the attacks, please accept my deepest sympathies.

I guess most of you who accuse me of not understanding the conspiracy theory haven't seen the questions lately on YA saying that plane engines were never found, a plane never hit the Pentagon, etc. Those nuts are the ones I'm targeting. As for the rest of the theories, Al Queda never existed lol? cell phone companies & the govt creating fake phone calls? the buildings falling so perfectly it must have been demolition (that one's really funny, there are structural reports you can read that explain exactly how the towers fell), etc. MY question is infantile but you choose to believe some theory that the gov't covered up somethiing? We were attacked, and we didn't do it ourselves. No matter what happens of import in this country there are always those who have to find a way to suggest cover-up and alternate plots. Some things actually happen the way they seem to and this is one of them. If your evidence is so clear, I suppose we'll see an investigation soon right? lol can't wait

Answer 1

Let me just say... that people can say what they want, and have their theories, as to HOW, but the fact still remains, that speaking for my family and myself, we could have only wished that the call was "fabricated" and we werent "actors" when we were over come by devestation, as we were told our loved one was killed that day. It was a total feeling of despair, and with no body to bury, so theres really no sense of closure to the whole thing, so yeah I guess he is gone "forever" but, not by choice!!!

So joke all you want, I guess if it happened to you, you may have taken the whole thing differently.

Answer 2

Alright you want an answer, piece of cake. You start your argument using the statement "All those ppl who saw planes fltyinto the WTC". Only riduculous theories say anythng about planes not hitting the building. The popular theories state that bombs and thermite explsions brought the buildings down. There is much evidence to support the hypothesis. As for the Pentagon some ppl stated that a plane hit the building and some say it looked like a missile with wings. many theorists believe that an A-3 skywarrior carrying a missile slammed into the Pentagon. Much evidence to this as well, including engine that was 2.5 ft in diameter, how did that get there? The goverment if it has a recording of your voice has the technolgy to have conversations using the recording. This could explain the calls which were near impossible to make from 30,000 ft in 2001. Pay close attention to the mark Bingham call in which he addresses his mother using his full name, kind of weird right. there are answers to all of your questions, all you need to do is go to www.st911.org or talk to someone like myself who has studied the events. I find it interesting that you base your argument using only the flimsy areas that can't be proven one way or another. If you want to see how something like this could be pulled off, look at Operation Northwoods, a declassified Gov't document. Pay close attention to the hijacked planes in the document. i don't even understand your question about the air traffic controllers, and in no way did they have to be part of the plan, you would know that if you did the research, good luck with the research though, i hope that you will now look at both sides of the story. I can go on for hours, but i just wanted to answer your questions. 9/11 was an inside job, there are hundreds of reasons why, you just need to do the research and it will clear everyhtin up. It is our patriotic duty to find the truth, and no sane person can tell me that we have recieved the full truth, it is a big lie. By the way, it is common sense 9/11 is a conspiracy no matter what you believe. How in the worls could you explain it otherwise. Do you even know the definition of a conspiracy or are you that brainwashed.

Answer 3

Well my opinion isnt that the attacks didnt happen, to say so would be stupid.
I believe the government caused the attacks for justification to invade Iraq. Your question is stupid and infantile. WHy dont you think before you ask something. No sane person would think that and I know of no other "conspiracy theorist" as you call them who thinks that.
Instead you should focus on why people think that and then you will understand a little more about the true history of the United States.

Answer 4

You have misunderstood the role of a conspiracy theorist. I don't think they would ever claim that 911 didn't happen. You are looking for skeptics. They are actually the opposite to conspiracy theorists, as they doubt things that can't be proved, rather than believing things that can't be disproved. But it would be hard for even the most ardent skeptic to argue that 911 didn't happen, if they accept that anything at all is real, outside their own minds.

Answer 5

The strange thing was that both bldgs of 9/11 where leveled to the ground and they came down exactly or almost "vertically",
just like a controlled demolition by detonation ! weared !
*was it possible that that floors on top of the burning planes, including 2 or 3 floor below them being poured on the top of the whole lower levels without damaging them, just like some poured
water on top of a break that is standing on it's smallest area ! ?
The best way to find the truth is to use an old & similer buldg or
Bill Gate builds one to see what happens when a plane with no
passenger hit it ! what you think ? i'm opal.

Answer 6

Whether the events happened is not in doubt but there are truths about it which are out there- fully authenticated but unheard. A reasonable synopsis might be:

Al-Quaeda did not exist. Osama bin Laden ingratiated himself with local Mujadeheen and Taliban elements as a financier using his families fortune. These elements were and still are assisted by the ISI- the Pakistani Intelligence.

Bin Laden's business was funding members of local groups interested in commiting terrorist acts abroad. Bin Laden was approached by a group specifically created for the purpose of a single attack (9/11)- and he agreed to finance the group.

So 9/11 happened. This was embarassing for the government. They had tonnes of information about this attack and any competent within the administration (with the President having ultimate responsibility) could have stopped it. They didn't because they were waiting for the hand of the ISI to show so they could nab the terrorists AND Pakistan.

After 9/11 an 'informant' to the FBI spoke first about the sophisticated network called Al-Quaeda. He was someone who cheated money from Bin Laden and needed protection- so he whored himself out to the fantasies of CIA types which wanted to believe in a sophisticated network. In fact it was the propaganda value of the American panic which created the network- which was no more than an address book of Mujahedeen veterans.

So now the Al-Queada cat's out the bag- they need to attack it and a base to do it from (However Rumsfeld wanted to ignore Afghanistan and head straight to Iraq- but there was no evidence). So they forget Pakistan as a target- too popular and significant a country anyway (with the A bomb). But they threaten to 'bomb it to the Stone age' to get their agreement. After the deal they hide the hand of Pakistan by issuing knowingly false names of the hijackers. One hijacker is named supposedly because an FBI agent 'found his passport (perfectly intact) on the ground at Ground Zero'. Five more so-called hijackers show up alive and well in Egyptian prisons and in Saudi Arabia.

With Pakistan on-side they bomb Taleban targets- largely caves. Their priority is regime change however and the real targets including Bin Laden himself are ignored

This is because 'terror' is too useful to the neocons. Straight after 9/11 National Security types pull their Reagan era wish lists out of the filing cabinet marked repression, and get them passed by misleading and frightening people into accepting an increasingly aggressive, belligerent, and militarised foreign policy and reduced civil liberties at home.

Your Question stems from the neocon tactic of overblowing the skeptics opinions- portraying them as people who doubt the very existence of 9/11 or think Bush was behind it. 9/11 is not in question but the facts of every goverment act around this event are murky in ethic, competence and transparency

Answer 7

hahahaha good one--I live near the wtc and worked for project liberty supervising crisis counselors. my wife is muslim and i've heard that some people her family knows actually believe there were no jews in the towers o 911. i personally know a few who perished and saw many carrying pictures at the annual ceremonies. conspiracy my butt. you got the right idea

Answer 8

forone thing NOONE seen or heard a plane hit the pentagon....they heard a loud sound,,,,did you see the pic of the hole at the pentagon your going to tell me a big aircraft it that building....and look at the pics of the planes that hit the wtc look undernieth and see what is connected to the bottom of them planes,,,and the flash the planes gave just before hitting the building....and watch how the buildings fell FROM THE BOTTOM....the people were on the planes just there were no terroist on them planes.i have vidio tapes if you would care to see them.just e-mail me ...se what our wonderfull president is doing to his own country,,,just so he can take over all the oil wells and become richer..

Answer 9

This is a trick 'Don't Look at the Bush Train Wreck of Government' question, right? Isn't it a useful GOP distraction?

Answer 10

Who is saying the airliners never hit the towers? that would be stupid. Who say,s people did not die? All that needed to happen is this...
1. Terrorist do wan,t to kill Americans
2 Someone at the highest levels of our government makes contact thru a buffer with a high level terrorist (osama bin missin) and gives them the plan.
3 The hijackers not knowing of the plan are told by O.B.L. to hijack the planes and that they will be able to get pass security.
4 High ranking officials at airport security are instructed to let the hijackers thru, not knowing why they let the hijackers thru.
The rest is history.