English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The shameless rebuttals are not about the futility of the deaths of innocents but the fact that it may have been overstated.

2006-10-26 14:06:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

They're not Americans so the cons don't care.

2006-10-26 14:21:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This administration is a stain on America.

similarly, Tony Snow reports that Bush was never really "stay the course" because Bush ONLY said the phrase EIGHT times (even though Olbermann, Daily Show, et. al. readily supply footage of the commander in chief saying this 20-30 times).

First graders wouldnt stand for this, why should we?

2006-10-26 21:11:23 · answer #2 · answered by dr schmitty 7 · 0 1

The shameless part is the lies you liberals spread. You liberals deliberately lie and exaggerate to change the subject from the issues to debating the veracity of the statements.

If you want to discuss issues try using real facts, not lies and propaganda.

2006-10-26 21:17:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It's not a matter of being acceptable, it simply a matter of accuracy. By the way the 655K was not "reported" , it was estimated by statisticians using 547 death reports. It's a mathemetical theory, not a "report" of fact.

2006-10-26 21:10:01 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1 1

Whats your solution?

If we tell the terrorists to leave us alone they will right?

The terrorists are smart. Smarter then you obvisouly. They are increasing the violence with elections near. Because they know liberals want to cut and run. So I mean if we're creating "so many terrorists" why would the terrorists do this? Wouldn't they want to keep the Republicans?

2006-10-26 21:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by John 3 · 2 1

What difference does it make? Saddam was killing people whether we we there or not. At least when we kill them it is quick. Saddam used to feed people to dogs, throw them off buildings, run them feet first through shredders.......

2006-10-26 21:42:24 · answer #6 · answered by rjf 3 · 0 0

well ofcourse it is, you silly baboon. its more than 6 times more acceptable. we didn't kill the 100k either, the terrorists did. time to grow up junior, and act like a man

2006-10-26 21:21:43 · answer #7 · answered by iberius 4 · 0 1

Tell me how many people were lost due to insurgency after our own cival war.You know. Those pesky guys in white sheets.

2006-10-26 21:22:33 · answer #8 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3 · 0 1

Not one death (American or Iraq) is acceptable. Especially not for the clusterfreak going on right now.

2006-10-26 21:10:05 · answer #9 · answered by Cold Stone 2 · 0 1

Still probably way high. You might want to consider who is doing most of the killing. It's not us.

2006-10-26 21:16:36 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers