English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My bud and I have a true "brokeback moutain" relationship. Its very special and we have a strong bond. We both have two different backgrounds. I'm like Jack and he Ennis emotionally. He's an asipring artist, and I am into business. Were in our 20's and he chose to move to Europe. He asked me if I want to go, I said sure I want to be close to him, but things changed when I got accepted for a masters program at a business school in the US. I decided to stay and finish up. Now I feel like 2 years of school seems to be a long time, I hurt everynight thinking about losing him. It was a choice of my future or the "rare, weird" feelings we both have for each other. So my question to you is, did I pick the right path here? Was I right to choose my future over my heart?

2006-10-26 13:19:43 · 4 answers · asked by dustin m 1 in Family & Relationships Other - Family & Relationships

4 answers

I think you did choose the right path. It is best to work on your future while the opportunity is there. At least you had said 'yes' initially to go over. I think maybe you need to talk to him and say - will you be there in two years - are we strong enough that we may be able to continue this relationship after two years.

2006-10-26 13:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by gretphemelger 5 · 0 0

First allow me resolve something. The Old Testament or Covenant and the New don't contradict every different at any factor. If some thing the New is stricter than the historical. Even the New testomony speaks out in opposition to gays. I Timothy one million. The matters that had been mistaken within the Old are simply as mistaken within the New. It isn't a predjudice, homosexuality is a sin and a damaging use of ones frame. Even in Jesus's time the attention for an eye fixed was once very prevelent. Jesus was once now not refuting that inspiration, he was once simply environment a bigger normal. On the interpretation kick. There may also be many diffrent methods to interperet a distinctive line from the Bible. First there may be the language. The Old was once written in Hebrew. That is particularly simple, besides we don't have phrases with precisely the identical that means because the phrases in Hebrew. So there's a judgement name made, and so they use the nearest identical. The New was once written in Greek or Aramaic. The subsequent factor is the tradition of the time. If you mentioned in these days that 2 guys had been in a mattress, it could be obvious as they're homosexual. In the ones instances it wasn't exceptional for 3 or 4 guys to proportion a mattress. Eufamisms also are diffrent among cultures. In mattress in our tradition refers to intercourse. Then it didn't. By the best way, Jesus by no means spoke out in opposition to slave preserving. In the context of the Old, a slave isn't what modern day day persons could have regarded a slave. Slavery of the time was once extra of indentured servitude for a given interval of time, both to repay a debt or to pay for against the law. The slave was once now not a work of estate. Just on the grounds that a sin is authorised through the common populus it does not make it any much less of a sin.

2016-09-01 03:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you think that you made the right choice then you did, if you think that you didn't them you didn't. Just make sure that you keep intouch and visit eachother sometimes. you can always transfer to a school over there

2006-10-26 13:33:13 · answer #3 · answered by dancing_diva 2 · 0 0

only time will tell.

2006-10-26 13:44:36 · answer #4 · answered by Lovebug123 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers