he was put to death last night by leathal injection. He murdered more than 5 people.
Do you think its fair?
Do you agree with the death penatly?
im all for the death penatly.
Pro-lifers think that life is valuble, and thats my point. Brfore you say that two wrongs dont make a right think or the heinous acts that were put upon these people. Its not fair for them to decide sombody should be killed for no reason. I think they should have fried him.
2006-10-26 12:39:27 · 8 answers · asked by flangel80190 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I'm very pro-life. That's why he needed to be executed last night. He denied five people (at least) of their lives.
2006-10-26 13:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by missingora 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that the acts he committed were some of the sickest acts I have read about. I fully believe that he should have been executed. I go with the theory - an eye for an eye.
As for the pro lifers who think life is valuable - what about the lives of those he took. They are more valuable than his because they are not murderers.
2006-10-26 13:11:05 · answer #2 · answered by gretphemelger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the 1st reason is as a results of the fact the dying penalty fees greater, they get greater appeals and maximum probable wont be placed to dying for an fairly long term if ever. I lots desire the undeniable fact that, if to blame, they spend life in penitentiary without parole and extensive-unfold they might think of how badly they screwed up and how they wasted their lives and might think of of all they ignored out on. i can't help it yet every time I stress via a penitentiary I pay attention Nelson from the Simpsons in my head. I stated HaHa! disasters, enable em rot.
2016-11-25 22:24:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I agree with the death penatly and yes he should have been put to death for the murder of the 5 people.
2006-10-26 13:06:55 · answer #4 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He got off too easy with a needle in his arm. I think they should have gut shot him & let him die slowly & painfully.
Yes!!! by the way, I DO agree with the death penalty. Pro-Lifers are whinning bleeding hearts. I'll bet their views would change if their family member is every a victim of senseless murder.....
2006-10-26 13:04:15 · answer #5 · answered by More Lies & More Smoke Screens 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should have executed himas soon as they found him guilty. Our tax dollars pay for him to live and eat for the whole time he was on death row. Just like Scott Peterson, they should fry his a$$ too. I also thinkt hey should execute child molesters and people that commit crimes of that nature.
2006-10-26 12:54:19 · answer #6 · answered by Ms.BusyBody 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it depends if they do feel remorse let them live with that guilty feeling for the rest of their natural life in prison. If they don't... then get rid of them.
2006-10-26 12:49:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No... he should have been executed a long, long time ago.
Those victims of his died 16 years ago. Where were their rights?
2006-10-26 12:46:25 · answer #8 · answered by J.D. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋