Dallas was far a better team than the Patriots are or were. They were all legends of that era. Brady and co. came and went like a fart in the wind. With the exception of Brady who did set his mark in the game.
2006-10-26 11:54:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by rdsknsrul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference between Patriots and Dallas of the 90's is the salary cap. Dallas bought the 90's, Patriots have done the same thing under the salary cap. So Dallas of the 90's don't compare to what New England has done. Take out the dark days before the salary cap and Dallas has what, two Superbowls. Dallas and San Fransisco were no better than the Yankees, until the NFL fixed it. Now they have sucked ever since. Thank GOD for the salary cap.
2006-10-27 00:40:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
don't be unhappy. First, in case you have been born in ninety 3 then you definately have been purely 7 for the time of 2000, i became born in 89 or perhaps however i became 10 i do no longer bear in mind maximum of the ninety's. next, the television high quality became good, yet now it extremely is retarded frightening how sparkling that's. Now extremely some the song interior the ninety's became unwell, maximum rap has taken over on account that 2002-10, which i will purely stand in small doses. i think of each and every physique misses the previous, yet so a strategies as technologies, 2010 is the ****, besides as each and every thing else. *I do omit warheads however, omg those have been unwell as fuhh.
2016-11-25 22:20:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Cowboys were a dominant team in the 90s and won 3 titles. The Partriots won 3 titles in their own way. I think it is normal for fans of the 'Boys to defend the honor of their team, and the comparisons were valid when the Pats won 3 in 4 years. Also - the coaching comparisons are not even close, as Belichick is far superior to Johnson and Switzer, and has kept his team in contention for the entire time he has been in charge except for year one.
2006-10-27 01:17:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jim G 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok tom brady is not a better qb than troy aikman. troy won more games in any decade than any other qb in history. aikman retired with a 60 percent completion efficiency. brady doesnt even come close to that. plus aikman is in the hall of the fame. there is no comparison the patriots havent even dominated this decade. you cant call the patriots a dynasty. u have to at least make it to the playoffs every year in that decade. not only did the cowboys make it to the plays almost every year in the 90's they made it to the NFC Championship most years. Please spare me the comparison. The Patriots are a Junior Varsity team compared to the Cowboys of the 90's.
2006-10-26 12:03:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by originalitybygeorge 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I grew up in Dallas since the days of the REAL Cowboys under Tom Landry, and since he was fired, I fired them, and all professional football, whether in NFL or in college ranks or highschool. And the cowboys haven't been the Cowboys since the days of Tom Landry, so they're no good for any comparison to anything, anywhere. God Bless you.
2006-10-26 12:01:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brady > Aikman but other than that Dallas was a better team. I would say their defenses were about the same. Both were dominant, anyway.
2006-10-26 12:01:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Justin N 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah me too. the 90's cowboys or the 70's-80's Steelers would eat them for lunch.
2006-10-27 03:28:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by onemocc 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
troy brown
tom brady is better than troy aikman
i dont really see them ever comparing the two
2006-10-26 11:53:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Antwaan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-10-26 11:51:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋