English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

I think it is both, but really believe people are aggressive in certain situations because they are hard wired that way. If they are just doing it to be doing it, that is more learned behavior. Don't know if you can separate that egg without breaking the yolk, so to speak.

2006-10-26 11:02:20 · answer #1 · answered by krautlover2u 2 · 0 0

Human aggression is seemingly better explained by socialization as through the work of Dutton on the Abusive Personality, amongst others, there are too many situations in which our aggression, such as intimiate abuse, are too specific and do not provide any benefit for selection. It does not make much evolutionary sense to beat ones spouse, and not beat the people who you think they are cheating on you with. Likewise, far too many people are not aggressive in enough situations to necesarily prove that it is a genetically passed on trait that has evolutionary benefit.

Culturally, people have suggested a lot of things which seem to have part of the answer, between patriarchy, social learning theory, cyclical or borderline personalities amongst others. Although genetics may have some role, seemingly minor, the number of other potential factors which are social in nature seem to make cultural aspects better to explain the phenomona.

2006-10-26 21:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by blindog23 4 · 0 0

enable me play devil's recommend right here for a minute. Animal aggression and human aggression while it stems from a canines are 2 multiple issues, yet, and this would properly be a substantial yet, tension is tension... What does that advise? What which ability is that on the same time as some human beings reported that one and all animal aggression is predicated in prey tension, i think of that that view is inaccurate. Animal aggression is in line with social aggression, the only energetic form of aggression there is. in case you place a rabbit and a hound mutually, as somebody reported, there will be interest on the canines's area, yet, there will be no chase or prey kill until there is stream...that's what prey does and that's what the call "prey tension" shows! Social aggression on the different hand is in line with a canines's point of view of the international, his temperament, his environment, etc. that's what triggers a canines to chew, many of the time besides while there is not any stream! I understand what the spirit of the question right it is, yet, as I reported until now, tension is tension. as an occasion, i will take a golden and prepare that canines, with the applicable drives of direction, to do detection artwork particularly of looking. i will take a pit bull and prepare it to do police artwork particularly of coming up it combat with yet another animal. Animal aggression is a factor of the DNA in a breed mutually with a pit bull, I have no subject with that. A properly bred pit won't or shouldn't instruct aggression in direction of a human, yet, has it take place? of direction it has, daily as a depend of certainty. Do you already know what i'm attempting to place across right here? If no longer, please enable me be responsive to and that i would be chuffed to describe extra!! wish I helped. upload: i'm sorry...confident, a properly bred pit bull shouldn't instruct any aggression in direction of a human, yet, the circumstances iy has occurred, it became in line with temperament themes, etc. of direction any canines can instruct the comparable form of aggression in direction of a human, yet, we are talking approximately canines right here that would have the strain, the dimensions and the choose to returned up any danger with a intense chew. I actual have knowledgeable countless pit bull form canines in interest and that i be responsive to for a certainty that they are in a position to do it. This area can get slightly at a loss for words and that i might desire to jot down a e book length article with the intention to be clarify it totally, even nevertheless, those are the data because of the fact the question became phrased.

2016-12-08 22:06:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Human aggression is best explained by genetic evolution and survival of the fittest.

2006-10-26 11:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by Clown Knows 7 · 0 0

Good Q? :) i'd say socialisation and culture, children who see and hear violence grow up thinking its the norm and continue to do it themselves. Yet i know personally of 2 people who never new there fathers and have taken on the fathers violent traits even though they have grown up within a loving and very normal family.

2006-10-26 11:06:31 · answer #5 · answered by English Knight 2 · 0 1

socialization and culture. and boy are we headed for trouble with all the violence that kids are exposed to on a daily basis.

2006-10-26 11:01:09 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

Much more violent than an angry river, are its margins that oppress it...Think about this...

2006-10-26 11:32:26 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers