No ideas no answers just a feeble try to change things. Funny to watch him whine and cry though.
2006-10-26 10:32:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chuck P 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
nicely, they do no longer desire to let us know that the banks are extremely seven trillion income debt. Does giving them a unmarried trillion extremely do something yet postpone the inevitable certainty that they are going to bypass bankrupt in any case. enable's fake that they gave a crap and weren't doing their section to make the financial corporation of the international get richer... it variety of feels to me that they could desire to chop back the federal government...take a examine out what courses that they have got and dismantle them. the answer will no longer be taxing individuals further and extra so as that they could play seize-up. they have way too many people on payroll that do no longer something greater effective than think of of latest a thank you to spend money and their buddies are greater effective than chuffed to bypass those costs. One could could desire to be ignorant of see that it extremely isn't working. Bush gained a checklist-breaking nationwide deficit. Obama is on %. to shatter that. those those that are working our united states are not clever. they at the instant are not useful. There are too a lot of them and too many egos floating around...all of them enforce their own judgements on a thank you to repair issues. it extremely is often a recipe for catastrophe. So, they could desire to do something and that's shrinking the heck out of the government. Dismantle the IRS. end the Fed. i be attentive to that some people won't like this yet minimize the federal brokers. will we actually need one million CIA, FBI, DHS, INS and SS brokers? i do no longer see why we do. the federal government grew to become into no longer meant to be as large because it extremely is.
2016-12-16 14:58:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by lotta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Part of his responsibility to his party is to help other Republicans.
That's pretty much the only reason he makes speeches- to campaign for himself or the party.
Name a politician that doesn't. Hell, Bill Clinton is still on the campaign trail.
2006-10-26 10:38:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course he was. That's the nature of the game.
Basically you are admitting, however, that the Republicans are at risk of losing office moreso than any effort for the Dems to win.
2006-10-26 10:34:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
That's pretty much the only reason he makes speeches- to campaign for himself or the party.
2006-10-26 10:34:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
have you seen him make a speech when he was not trying to save something? he has to stay the course and not cut and run.
2006-10-26 10:33:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by roy40372 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't think he said anything he doesn't say in all his other speeches. He says the same thing; over....and over.....and over..again and again....and again.
2006-10-26 11:19:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by pixles 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know.I have spotted several Churches with Pro Republican flyers, and encourage all to turn them into IRS.
2006-10-26 10:33:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Of course i do and of course that was the case. Whoever disagrees is blind, in my opinion.
2006-10-26 10:37:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by UVRay 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Criticize him when he doesn't change, criticize him when he does.
2006-10-26 10:37:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by mei-lin 5
·
2⤊
1⤋