I propose it be called the "you-should-know-better tax"
Taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, gambling, etc... are important sources of revenues for governments and they're not going to give them up anytime soon.
However, doesn't 'sin tax' seem irrational and paternalistic to you? Doesn't it also violate the principle of separation of Church and State? Sin is, after all, a religious concept.
Don't get me wrong. I'm all for voluntary taxes. They're the easiest of all to avoid. All you have to do is not use the product.
But I suggest it should be called the "you-should-know-better tax". That would underline the fact you entirelly agree to pay that tax everytime you use one of those products.
What do you think? Any other name you would suggest?
2006-10-26
09:35:13
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics