2006-10-26 09:18:52 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
His soul got a "yesbel" prize recently.
I know cause I was the sole human reporter in that ceremony.
He died years before Sir Alfred Nobel's birth, buddy.
Tell me onething, were you kidding or you really are confused?Huh!!
2006-10-26 18:18:56 · answer #1 · answered by s0u1 reaver 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you are referring to Sir Isaac Newton, then no he did not get one. He died in 1727 and the first Nobel Prize was awarded in 1901. I could not find any Nobel prize recipients with Newton as a name.
2006-10-26 09:27:28 · answer #2 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No The nobel prize wasn't around in Newtons day.
2006-10-26 09:22:30 · answer #3 · answered by teddybear 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well no the Nobel prize did not exist at that time; but i believe he was nighted by the royal family England.
If one man deserved the Nobel prize it would be Newton
2006-10-26 10:41:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No . the greates scientists whose discoveries formed the foundation of later discoveries did not get anyNobel prize . In the modern times the great comedy is that the Nobel prize forpeace is being offered to so many who have worked or have writen about peace among the various commuities . But mahatma Gandhi .the only person in the world upto now who has practically demonstrated and proved the power of Ahimsa , non-violence and peaceful resistance by defeating the once most powerful Empire itself, has not yet been considered fo the award for peace . Great men did not work of recognition . Even the great religions have only preached about power of non-violence . But Gandhiji was the only one to have demosnatrated it to the entire world .There is none having the status of awarding any prize to such a noble soul!. So noble are the great inventers of the past .
2006-10-26 10:38:08 · answer #5 · answered by Infinity 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/av6YU
I thought better of the Nobel Prize Committee. This action clearly shows that they are rapidly swerving away from the practice of awarding awards to those who truly deserve them, What exactly did Obama do to deserve a Nobel Prize? Because he;s the first black President? Because, unlike previous Presidents, he has a rock-star status in the foreign world? Because he gave flowery speeches at Turkey and made promises of forging better ties, ending wars, solving the Palestinian - Israeli conflict? Guess what, those are still PROMISES! They are yet to materialize into policies and results. Obama should get the Nobel Prize, sure, but AFTER he has actually fulfilled his promises, not before it. Let me guess; if he does fulfill his promises and ends ME conflicts and establishes strong US relations with the rest of the world, will he get another Nobel Prize? What kind of a crazy committee awards a prize to a President first for promising many things, and then again for materializing them?
2016-04-06 04:27:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isaac Newton was already dead when Alfred Nobel created the prize. So no.
2006-10-26 09:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by javaHungerForce 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
newton is not the person to be given nobel prize
but newton prize should be given to nobel
2006-10-28 02:57:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the Nobel Prizes weren't around back then...they were invented in the early 1900's
2006-10-26 09:21:20 · answer #9 · answered by Archangel 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nopes ! noble prize came in 1901, while Sir Isaac Newton expired in d yr 1727.
2006-10-27 07:27:56 · answer #10 · answered by whatever 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋