definition of what is sovereignty of staes.then argue how it is affecting sovereignty of states for example states do not have control over their monetary policy,or they have to wait for the green light of other countries before they can adopt a certain policy,most emninent monetary policy.also should talk about external ties with other trading blocs outside the EU,whether it is possible for EU members to forge trading agreement with non-EU members.then discuss by saying it does not really undermine state sovereignty because member do have some policies which they can adopt without consultation of other states...example their defence policy or their education policy.
2006-10-26 09:16:16 · 3 answers · asked by anusha h 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Yes, I do agree. It involves a total loss of sovereignty. I've even heard the expressions 'member states' used instead of 'member countries.' I don't like it.
2006-10-26 09:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, these countries don't hold the purse strings anymore.
Yet, they were hamstrung before. The Dutch invented the CD but because of tariffs etc. a manufacturing base couldn't be established in Europe to exploit the patents. Inter European cooperation has made them competitive again, just look at Airbus.
2006-10-26 16:23:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes to some extent.
2006-10-27 01:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋