if gravity affects time what happens when you move out of all gravitational fields?

Question

we at this moment are in many gravitaional fields ie the earth, the sun, the galaxy etc these all affect time or our perception of it at least but what would happen if we moved into intergalatic space away from external sources of gravity, what would be the effects if we could go and come back from such a place?

Answer 1

I presume that is merely a hypothetical speculation.
That being given you will have to answer it yourself.
In my universe the further you move away from all other mass,
the weaker (proportionally) gravity and its other effects act on you. However Infinity being infinite you can never move far enough away for gravity effects to diminish entirely.

Answer 2

Large gravitational fields slow down time. In deep space there is still a tiny gravitational force from distant galaxies but in theory time would pass by 'normally' as there is nothing to slow it down.
The effect of removing the gravity of the Earth, Moon and Sun on a clock would not be detectable without a very accurate atomic clock as the effect of the gravity is miniscule.

Answer 3

Basically you can't "move out of all gravitational fields".
Even in the remotest parts of the universe you are still subject to gravity caused by all matter that exists - the further away you are from a body the weaker the gravitational effect, but it never really stops (slightly off topic, but you exert a gravitational force on the earth).
So to answer your question... to be free of gravity you would have to be in another universe with different laws of physics.

I hope this makes sense... I am slightly drunk ;)

Edit: the gravitational time dilation effect has been measured. But the masses needed to make a noticeable difference (to our perception of time) would be... well, astronomical ;)

Answer 4

Time slows down in very strong gravity fields. It would run noticeably slow on the surface of a neutron star and it stops at the event horizon of a black hole, but the mere gravity of Earth, the Sun and the Milky Galaxy makes almost no difference at all.

Answer 5

space,time, continuum theory would take affect where the theory is that the further you move away from the gravitational pull of the earth and the deeper you go into space the less meaning time has and the aging affect on your body does not account for anything so you could theoretically return to earth before your parents were born depending on how long you had travelled in deep space (BEST TO ASK AN ASTRO PHYSICIST) I'm just hypothesizing

Answer 6

Hmm... I wish I knew Einstein's general relativity well enough... I recall strong gravity slows time down, doesn't it? Then moving out of all gravitational fields... I don't know how much that would accelerate your time. I guess it wouldn't make time infinitely short, but I'll leave this to the physicists.

Answer 7

usually relativity, via the definition of Minkowski area-time, mild follows a on the instant 4D line. i think it extremely is the source of the parable that mild has no mass. If mild has no mass in GR, it extremely is using fact "mass" would not have a similar meaning in GR using fact the meaning given to it via Newton. In 3-D Newtonian area, mild bends whilst passing by the gravitational field of a action picture star. This adjustments the path of the mild's momentum vector. Subtracting the momentum previously bending from the momentum after bending provides a non-0 momentum-distinction vector pointing on the action picture star. If momentum is to be conserved, an equivalent and opposite momentum might desire to be imparted to the action picture star. In different words, the action picture star might desire to sense a gravitational attraction to the mild. Therefor, mild has gravitational mass. Newton defined inertial mass via the formulation, f = ma, which inserts properly for debris with a relax mass, even at relativistic speeds. This formulation works for photons, too, as long using fact the stress and acceleration are lateral purely. It doesnt artwork, in any respect, for a photon if the stress has a non-lateral component, using fact the photon can't develop up forward or backward. we want new definitions of mass and stress. i'm no mathematician, so i would be entering into over my head, yet i think the appropriate definitions are: m = p/v (the place p is momentum and v is speed), and f = dp/dt (the place dp/dt is the cost of replace of momentum). those definitions are in appropriate settlement with f = ma the place debris with a relax mass are in contact. they have the distinctive benefit, despite the fact that, of applicability to photons and neutrinos. i've got self assurance that the inertial mass and gravitational mass of the photon are equivalent. I defer to the mathematicians to confirm regardless of if those formulation contradict standard relativity, taking under consideration that Minkowski tacitly altered the meanings of such suggestions as "mass".

Answer 8

Without gravity time would move at it's fastest pace...which is not very much faster than we currently experience. We would age just a bit faster than your twin brother on Earth. They have done something similar to this with atomic clocks flying at high altitudes. when compared to their "twin Brother " on Earth, the clocks in the plane measred time faster.

Answer 9

I think spacemen age slightly less for the duration of their flight, than those left on earth.

Answer 10

time would not be distorted and run approx 1/10000000000000000000 of a sec faster each month.